On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 01:16:09PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> There's no need to make the machine allow every possible sysbus
> device.  We can now just add xen-sysdev to the allowed list.
> 
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.per...@citrix.com>
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>

I've tested the patch series with every hotplug things I could think of,
and it worked fine.

Acked-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@citrix.com>

> ---
> Changes series v1 -> v2:
> * New patch added to series
> ---
>  hw/xen/xen_backend.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/xen/xen_backend.c b/hw/xen/xen_backend.c
> index 82380ea9ee..7445b506ac 100644
> --- a/hw/xen/xen_backend.c
> +++ b/hw/xen/xen_backend.c
> @@ -564,12 +564,7 @@ static void xen_set_dynamic_sysbus(void)
>      ObjectClass *oc = object_get_class(machine);
>      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
>  
> -    /*
> -     * Emulate old mc->has_dynamic_sysbus=true assignment
> -     *
> -     *TODO: add only Xen devices to the list
> -     */
> -    machine_class_allow_dynamic_sysbus_dev(mc, TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE);
> +    machine_class_allow_dynamic_sysbus_dev(mc, TYPE_XENSYSDEV);
>  }
>  
>  int xen_be_register(const char *type, struct XenDevOps *ops)

-- 
Anthony PERARD

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to