Hi,
On 22/03/18 08:16, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 03/21/2018 04:32 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
>> index 131358a5a1..22c70ff7cd 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
>> @@ -981,6
Hi Andre,
On 03/21/2018 04:32 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
index 131358a5a1..22c70ff7cd 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -981,6 +981,16 @@ unsigned int vgic_max_vcpus(const struct domain *d)
Now that we have both the old VGIC prepared to cope with a sibling and
the code for the new VGIC in place, lets add a Kconfig option to enable
the new code and wire it into the Xen build system.
This will add a compile time option to use either the "old" or the "new"
VGIC.
In the moment this is