On 2019/4/2 23:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.04.19 at 14:11, wrote:
>> By the way, how about the patch 01/15 of this series?
>> If it's fine, could you please offer Acked-by tag for it?
>
> I've yet to look at v4 of it.
Andrew said the change of patch 01/15 should rebase over
http://xenbits.
>>> On 02.04.19 at 14:11, wrote:
> By the way, how about the patch 01/15 of this series?
> If it's fine, could you please offer Acked-by tag for it?
I've yet to look at v4 of it.
Jan
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://
On 2019/4/2 18:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.04.19 at 08:46, wrote:
>> On 2019/4/1 16:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 30.03.19 at 11:42, wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_amd.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_amd.c
@@ -538,28 +538,12 @@ int svm_vpmu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
>>> On 02.04.19 at 08:46, wrote:
> On 2019/4/1 16:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 30.03.19 at 11:42, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_amd.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_amd.c
>>> @@ -538,28 +538,12 @@ int svm_vpmu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -int __init
On 2019/4/1 16:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.03.19 at 11:42, wrote:
@@ -876,6 +877,10 @@ static int __init vpmu_init(void)
if ( amd_vpmu_init() )
vpmu_mode = XENPMU_MODE_OFF;
break;
+case X86_VENDOR_HYGON:
+if ( hygon_vpmu_init() )
+ vpmu_mo
>>> On 30.03.19 at 11:42, wrote:
> @@ -876,6 +877,10 @@ static int __init vpmu_init(void)
> if ( amd_vpmu_init() )
> vpmu_mode = XENPMU_MODE_OFF;
> break;
> +case X86_VENDOR_HYGON:
> +if ( hygon_vpmu_init() )
> + vpmu_mode = XENPMU_MODE_OFF;
> +
As Hygon Dhyana CPU share similar PMU architecture with AMD family
17h one, so add Hygon Dhyana support in vpmu_arch_initialise() and
vpmu_init() by sharing AMD code path.
Split the common part in amd_vpmu_init() to a static function
_vpmu_init(), making AMD and Hygon to call the shared function t
