On 26.03.2020 14:42, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:50:48AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 25.03.2020 22:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> All the requisite infrastructure looks to be already present.
>>
>> ... there's the one open prereq question of what happens upon
>> tool chain
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:50:48AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.03.2020 22:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > All the requisite infrastructure looks to be already present.
>
> ... there's the one open prereq question of what happens upon
> tool chain updates. It's not clear to me if/how kconfig wou
On 25.03.2020 22:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/03/2020 12:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> With the exception of HAVE_AS_QUOTED_SYM, populate the results into a
>> generated header instead of (at least once per [sub]directory) into
>> CFLAGS. This results in proper rebuilds (via make dependencies) in c
On 24/03/2020 12:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
> With the exception of HAVE_AS_QUOTED_SYM, populate the results into a
> generated header instead of (at least once per [sub]directory) into
> CFLAGS. This results in proper rebuilds (via make dependencies) in case
> the compiler used changes between builds.
With the exception of HAVE_AS_QUOTED_SYM, populate the results into a
generated header instead of (at least once per [sub]directory) into
CFLAGS. This results in proper rebuilds (via make dependencies) in case
the compiler used changes between builds. It additionally eases
inspection of which assem
