Hi Andrii,
Thank you for the numbers.
On 26/12/2018 11:20, Andrii Anisov wrote:
From: Andrii Anisov
This patch series is an attempt to reduce IRQ latency with the
old GIC implementation (gic-vgic). These patches originally based
on XEN 4.10 release. The motivation was to improve benchmark
res
Hi,
On 02/01/2019 18:33, André Przywara wrote:
On 26/12/2018 11:20, Andrii Anisov wrote:
Then I looked at the IRQ handler and stumbled upon the function pointers
we are using. I was eyeing them before, because my hunch is they are
costly, especially on big cores, as it might be hard for the CPU
Hello Andre,
On 02.01.19 20:33, André Przywara wrote:
Many thanks for generating these numbers, this is very useful.
But: could you make any sense out them? I plotted them, but they don't
seem to be very conclusive.
Those numbers are mostly intended to show per patch effects. But I kept them
On 26/12/2018 11:20, Andrii Anisov wrote:
> From: Andrii Anisov
>
> This patch series is an attempt to reduce IRQ latency with the
> old GIC implementation (gic-vgic). These patches originally based
> on XEN 4.10 release. The motivation was to improve benchmark
> results of a system given to a cu
From: Andrii Anisov
This patch series is an attempt to reduce IRQ latency with the
old GIC implementation (gic-vgic). These patches originally based
on XEN 4.10 release. The motivation was to improve benchmark
results of a system given to a customer for evaluation.
This patch series is tailored f
