On 06/13/2018 05:18 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Jim: please read down to where I discuss
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair. If you have any insight I'd appreciate
it. Let me know if you want me to preserve the logs, which will
otherwise expire in a few weeks.
Whoa, sorry for the delay. This mail found
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-4.8-testing test] 124100: regressions - FAIL"):
> I'd favor a sufficiently justified (as it is now) force push, and then
> an immediate release. As you say elsewhere, the problem with in
> particular the albanas has been bad enough for it to be sufficiently
> unpredict
>>> On 13.06.18 at 13:18, wrote:
> Jan asked me to investigate why we weren't getting a push on Xen 4.8.
> I investigated the failures in this osstest report.
>
> I think we have a combination of:
>
> * Flaky armhf hardware
>
> * A real Xen-related heisenbug bug (but which is not a regression
Jan asked me to investigate why we weren't getting a push on Xen 4.8.
I investigated the failures in this osstest report.
I think we have a combination of:
* Flaky armhf hardware
* A real Xen-related heisenbug bug (but which is not a regression)
(the EFAULT libxc/linux bug; CC to Juergen)
flight 124100 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/124100/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-xsm broken in 124070
build-i386-pvops