On 19/11/2018 10:39, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 08:05 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 15/11/2018 00:22, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 11:18 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
Oh, sorry. Of course it does. Dereferencing a percpu variable
directly can't
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 08:05 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 15/11/2018 00:22, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 11:18 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > Oh, sorry. Of course it does. Dereferencing a percpu variable
> > > directly can't work. How silly of me.
> > >
> > > The
On 15/11/2018 00:22, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 11:18 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Oh, sorry. Of course it does. Dereferencing a percpu variable
>> directly can't work. How silly of me.
>>
>> The attached variant should repair that. Tested to not break booting.
>
> Strictly
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 11:18 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Oh, sorry. Of course it does. Dereferencing a percpu variable
> directly can't work. How silly of me.
>
> The attached variant should repair that. Tested to not break booting.
Strictly speaking, shouldn't you have an atomic_init() in
On 08/11/18 11:18, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08/11/2018 10:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 08/11/18 09:18, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 08/11/2018 09:14, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 08/11/18 08:08, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 07/11/2018 10:30, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Hi Juergen
On 08/11/2018 10:57, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 08/11/18 09:18, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 08/11/2018 09:14, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 08/11/18 08:08, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 07/11/2018 10:30, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Juergen / Boris,
>
> Last week i tested Linux
On 08/11/18 09:18, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08/11/2018 09:14, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 08/11/18 08:08, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2018 10:30, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Hi Juergen / Boris,
Last week i tested Linux kernel 4.19.0 stable with the Xen
On 08/11/2018 09:14, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 08/11/18 08:08, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 07/11/2018 10:30, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> Hi Juergen / Boris,
>>>
>>> Last week i tested Linux kernel 4.19.0 stable with the Xen "for-linus-4.20"
>>> branch pulled on top.
>>> Unfortunately i was
On 08/11/18 08:08, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 07/11/2018 10:30, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Hi Juergen / Boris,
>>
>> Last week i tested Linux kernel 4.19.0 stable with the Xen "for-linus-4.20"
>> branch pulled on top.
>> Unfortunately i was seeing guests lockup after some time, see below for the
On 07/11/2018 10:30, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Juergen / Boris,
>
> Last week i tested Linux kernel 4.19.0 stable with the Xen "for-linus-4.20"
> branch pulled on top.
> Unfortunately i was seeing guests lockup after some time, see below for the
> logging from one of the guest
> which i
On 11/7/18 5:45 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 07/11/18 23:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 11/7/18 4:30 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> Hi Juergen / Boris,
>>>
>>> Last week i tested Linux kernel 4.19.0 stable with the Xen "for-linus-4.20"
>>> branch pulled on top.
>>> Unfortunately i was
On 07/11/18 23:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/7/18 4:30 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Hi Juergen / Boris,
>>
>> Last week i tested Linux kernel 4.19.0 stable with the Xen "for-linus-4.20"
>> branch pulled on top.
>> Unfortunately i was seeing guests lockup after some time, see below for
On 11/7/18 4:30 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Juergen / Boris,
>
> Last week i tested Linux kernel 4.19.0 stable with the Xen "for-linus-4.20"
> branch pulled on top.
> Unfortunately i was seeing guests lockup after some time, see below for the
> logging from one of the guest
> which i was
Hi Juergen / Boris,
Last week i tested Linux kernel 4.19.0 stable with the Xen "for-linus-4.20"
branch pulled on top.
Unfortunately i was seeing guests lockup after some time, see below for the
logging from one of the guest
which i was able to capture.
Reverting "xen: make xen_qlock_wait()
14 matches
Mail list logo