On 11.02.20 10:07, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 07/02/2020 08:04, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 06.02.20 15:02, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 06/02/2020 11:05, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 06/02/2020 09:57, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 05.02.20 17:03, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently investigating a Live-Patch
On 07/02/2020 08:04, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 06.02.20 15:02, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>> On 06/02/2020 11:05, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>>> On 06/02/2020 09:57, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 05.02.20 17:03, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently investigating a Live-Patch application
On 08.02.20 13:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 07/02/2020 08:42, Jürgen Groß wrote:
Without it being entirely clear that there's no alternative to
it, I don't think I'd be fine with re-introduction of
continue_hypercall_on_cpu(0, ...) into ucode loading.
I don't see a viable alternative.
On 07/02/2020 08:42, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>
>> Without it being entirely clear that there's no alternative to
>> it, I don't think I'd be fine with re-introduction of
>> continue_hypercall_on_cpu(0, ...) into ucode loading.
>
> I don't see a viable alternative.
Sorry to interject in the middle of
On 07.02.20 12:44, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 10:25:05AM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 07.02.20 09:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.02.2020 09:42, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 07.02.20 09:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.02.2020 09:04, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 06.02.20 15:02, Sergey Dyasli
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 10:25:05AM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 07.02.20 09:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 07.02.2020 09:42, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> > > On 07.02.20 09:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 07.02.2020 09:04, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> > > > > On 06.02.20 15:02, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> > > > > >
On 07.02.20 10:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.02.2020 10:25, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 07.02.20 09:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.02.2020 09:42, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 07.02.20 09:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.02.2020 09:04, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 06.02.20 15:02, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 06/02/2020
On 07.02.2020 10:25, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 07.02.20 09:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 07.02.2020 09:42, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>> On 07.02.20 09:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.02.2020 09:04, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 06.02.20 15:02, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>> On 06/02/2020 11:05, Sergey Dyasli
On 07.02.20 09:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.02.2020 09:42, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 07.02.20 09:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.02.2020 09:04, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 06.02.20 15:02, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 06/02/2020 11:05, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 06/02/2020 09:57, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 05.02.20
On 07.02.2020 09:42, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 07.02.20 09:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 07.02.2020 09:04, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>> On 06.02.20 15:02, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 06/02/2020 11:05, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> On 06/02/2020 09:57, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> On 05.02.20 17:03, Sergey
On 07.02.20 09:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.02.2020 09:04, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 06.02.20 15:02, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 06/02/2020 11:05, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 06/02/2020 09:57, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 05.02.20 17:03, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently investigating a Live-Patch
On 07.02.2020 09:04, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 06.02.20 15:02, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>> On 06/02/2020 11:05, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>>> On 06/02/2020 09:57, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 05.02.20 17:03, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently investigating a Live-Patch application
On 06.02.20 15:02, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 06/02/2020 11:05, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 06/02/2020 09:57, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 05.02.20 17:03, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently investigating a Live-Patch application failure in core-
scheduling mode and this is an example of what I
On 06.02.20 15:02, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 06/02/2020 11:05, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 06/02/2020 09:57, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 05.02.20 17:03, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently investigating a Live-Patch application failure in core-
scheduling mode and this is an example of what I
On 06/02/2020 11:05, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> On 06/02/2020 09:57, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> On 05.02.20 17:03, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm currently investigating a Live-Patch application failure in core-
>>> scheduling mode and this is an example of what I usually get:
>>> (it's easily
On 06/02/2020 09:57, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 05.02.20 17:03, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm currently investigating a Live-Patch application failure in core-
>> scheduling mode and this is an example of what I usually get:
>> (it's easily reproducible)
>>
>> (XEN) [ 342.528305]
On 05.02.20 17:03, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently investigating a Live-Patch application failure in core-
scheduling mode and this is an example of what I usually get:
(it's easily reproducible)
(XEN) [ 342.528305] livepatch: lp: CPU8 - IPIing the other 15 CPUs
(XEN) [
On 05.02.20 17:03, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently investigating a Live-Patch application failure in core-
scheduling mode and this is an example of what I usually get:
(it's easily reproducible)
(XEN) [ 342.528305] livepatch: lp: CPU8 - IPIing the other 15 CPUs
(XEN) [
Hello,
I'm currently investigating a Live-Patch application failure in core-
scheduling mode and this is an example of what I usually get:
(it's easily reproducible)
(XEN) [ 342.528305] livepatch: lp: CPU8 - IPIing the other 15 CPUs
(XEN) [ 342.558340] livepatch: lp: Timed out on
19 matches
Mail list logo
