Re: [Xen-devel] Making save/restore optional in toolstack, for edge/embedded derivatives

2020-01-08 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 03:20:36PM +, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 01:51:21PM -0500, Rich Persaud wrote: > > Linux stubdom patches currently require qemu in dom0 for consoles [1], > > due to the upstream toolstack need for save/restore. Until a > > long-term solution is available

Re: [Xen-devel] Making save/restore optional in toolstack, for edge/embedded derivatives

2020-01-08 Thread Wei Liu
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 01:51:21PM -0500, Rich Persaud wrote: > Linux stubdom patches currently require qemu in dom0 for consoles [1], > due to the upstream toolstack need for save/restore. Until a > long-term solution is available (multiple console support in > xenconsoled), would tools

[Xen-devel] Making save/restore optional in toolstack, for edge/embedded derivatives

2020-01-02 Thread Rich Persaud
Linux stubdom patches currently require qemu in dom0 for consoles [1], due to the upstream toolstack need for save/restore. Until a long-term solution is available (multiple console support in xenconsoled), would tools maintainers consider a patch that made save/restore build-time configurable