On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 12:36:35AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 19.12.18 at 13:54, wrote:
> On 19.12.18 at 12:55, wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 04:05:57AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> In any event, both Andrew and I must have overlooked the one
> >>> crucial place due to
>>> On 19.12.18 at 13:54, wrote:
On 19.12.18 at 12:55, wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 04:05:57AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> In any event, both Andrew and I must have overlooked the one
>>> crucial place due to which the assertion is indeed wrong from
>>> put_page_from_l2e():
>>>
>>>
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 05:54:42AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 19.12.18 at 12:55, wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 04:05:57AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> In any event, both Andrew and I must have overlooked the one
> >> crucial place due to which the assertion is indeed wrong from
>
>>> On 19.12.18 at 12:55, wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 04:05:57AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> In any event, both Andrew and I must have overlooked the one
>> crucial place due to which the assertion is indeed wrong from
>> put_page_from_l2e():
>>
>> int rc = _put_page_type(pg,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 04:05:57AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 18.12.18 at 23:19, wrote:
> > I tried updating my NetBSD dom0 to 4.11.1 (from 4.11.0 with security
> > patches),
>
> Hmm, the issue stems from the XSA-273 changes, so did you perhaps
> mean "with some security patches", and
>>> On 18.12.18 at 23:19, wrote:
> I tried updating my NetBSD dom0 to 4.11.1 (from 4.11.0 with security patches),
Hmm, the issue stems from the XSA-273 changes, so did you perhaps
mean "with some security patches", and you didn't have those ones
applied?
> and on a 32bits PV domU shutdown I get
Hello,
I tried updating my NetBSD dom0 to 4.11.1 (from 4.11.0 with security patches),
and on a 32bits PV domU shutdown I get (100% reproductible):
(XEN) Assertion 'preemptible' failed at mm.c:2493
(XEN) [ Xen-4.11.1nb0 x86_64 debug=y Tainted: C ]
