Re: [Xen-devel] staging-4.6 seems to be broken

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: staging-4.6 seems to be broken"): > Hrrrm indeed. 4.8 flight 12658 and 4.9 flight 12659 look about as bad as > the 4.6 one you've commented on. I took a look at the host histories for some of the hosts involved and these failures do not seem to have occurred at the same

Re: [Xen-devel] staging-4.6 seems to be broken

>>> On 14.05.18 at 15:46, wrote: > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: staging-4.6 seems to be broken"): >> On 11.05.18 at 17:02, wrote: >> > osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.6-testing test] 122657: regressions >> > - > ... >> > At least some of these

Re: [Xen-devel] staging-4.6 seems to be broken

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: staging-4.6 seems to be broken"): > On 11.05.18 at 17:02, wrote: > > osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.6-testing test] 122657: regressions - ... > > At least some of these are surely real regressions. > > Are you saying that just because of

Re: [Xen-devel] staging-4.6 seems to be broken

>>> On 11.05.18 at 17:02, wrote: > osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.6-testing test] 122657: regressions - > FAIL"): >> flight 122657 xen-4.6-testing real [real] >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122657/ >> >> Regressions :-( >> >> Tests which did

[Xen-devel] staging-4.6 seems to be broken

osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.6-testing test] 122657: regressions - FAIL"): > flight 122657 xen-4.6-testing real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/122657/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be