On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 02:46:52AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2025/5/6 21:50, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 02:18:55PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> >> Current logic of emulating legacy capability list is only for domU.
> >> So, expand it to emulate for dom0 too. Then it wil
On 2025/5/7 15:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 02:46:52AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2025/5/6 21:50, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 02:18:55PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
Current logic of emulating legacy capability list is only for domU.
So, e
On 2025/5/7 10:46, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2025/5/6 21:50, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 02:18:55PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>>> Current logic of emulating legacy capability list is only for domU.
>>> So, expand it to emulate for dom0 too. Then it will be easy to hide
>>> a ca
On 2025/5/6 21:50, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 02:18:55PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> Current logic of emulating legacy capability list is only for domU.
>> So, expand it to emulate for dom0 too. Then it will be easy to hide
>> a capability whose initialization fails in a func
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 02:18:55PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> Current logic of emulating legacy capability list is only for domU.
> So, expand it to emulate for dom0 too. Then it will be easy to hide
> a capability whose initialization fails in a function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen
Sorry,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 02:18:55PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> Current logic of emulating legacy capability list is only for domU.
> So, expand it to emulate for dom0 too. Then it will be easy to hide
> a capability whose initialization fails in a function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen
With th
On 23.04.2025 05:31, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2025/4/23 00:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.04.2025 08:18, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>>> @@ -759,10 +759,11 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev
>>> *pdev)
>>> PCI_CAP_ID_MSI,
>>> PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX,
>>> };
>
On 2025/4/23 00:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.04.2025 08:18, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> @@ -759,10 +759,11 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev
>> *pdev)
>> PCI_CAP_ID_MSI,
>> PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX,
>> };
>> +const unsigned int *caps = is_hwdom ?
On 21.04.2025 08:18, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> @@ -759,10 +759,11 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev
> *pdev)
> PCI_CAP_ID_MSI,
> PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX,
> };
> +const unsigned int *caps = is_hwdom ? NULL : supported_caps;
> +const unsigne
