Hi Jan,
On 15/04/2021 15:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.04.2021 16:30, Julien Grall wrote:
On 15/04/2021 15:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.04.2021 16:22, Julien Grall wrote:
On 15/04/2021 15:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.04.2021 13:59, Julien Grall wrote:
On 26/01/2021 09:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.04.2021 16:30, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 15/04/2021 15:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.04.2021 16:22, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 15/04/2021 15:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.04.2021 13:59, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 26/01/2021 09:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> With xen/common/decompress.h
On 15/04/2021 15:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.04.2021 16:22, Julien Grall wrote:
On 15/04/2021 15:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.04.2021 13:59, Julien Grall wrote:
On 26/01/2021 09:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
With xen/common/decompress.h now agreeing in both build modes about
what STATIC expands
On 15.04.2021 16:22, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 15/04/2021 15:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.04.2021 13:59, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 26/01/2021 09:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
With xen/common/decompress.h now agreeing in both build modes about
what STATIC expands to, there's no need for this
On 15/04/2021 15:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.04.2021 13:59, Julien Grall wrote:
On 26/01/2021 09:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
With xen/common/decompress.h now agreeing in both build modes about
what STATIC expands to, there's no need for this abstraction anymore.
Shouldn't you also mention
On 15.04.2021 13:59, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 26/01/2021 09:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> With xen/common/decompress.h now agreeing in both build modes about
>> what STATIC expands to, there's no need for this abstraction anymore.
>
> Shouldn't you also mention "INIT" and "INITDATA" here?
Two parts:
Hi Jan,
On 26/01/2021 09:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
With xen/common/decompress.h now agreeing in both build modes about
what STATIC expands to, there's no need for this abstraction anymore.
Shouldn't you also mention "INIT" and "INITDATA" here?
Cheers,
Requested-by: Andrew Cooper
