On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:13:20AM +0200, Petr Tesařík wrote:
> Fine with me. I removed it after all my testing showed no performance
> impact as long as the size of the initial SWIOTLB is kept at the
> default value (and sufficient for the workload), but it's OK for me if
> dynamic SWIOTLB
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 08:52:16 +0200
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Just to add a highlevel comment here after I feel like I need a little
> more time to review the guts.
>
> I'm still pretty concerned about the extra list that needs to be
> consulted in is_swiotlb_buffer, but I can't really think of
Just to add a highlevel comment here after I feel like I need a little
more time to review the guts.
I'm still pretty concerned about the extra list that needs to be
consulted in is_swiotlb_buffer, but I can't really think of
anything better. Maybe an xarray has better cache characteristics,
but
