On 11/30/2017 2:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.11.17 at 20:44, wrote:
So, we will use the following sequence to reset the requested
device/function.
- FLR (as first option)
- BUS/SLOT reset (as fall-back option) if FLR is not supported or any
issue with FLR
It
>>> On 29.11.17 at 20:44, wrote:
> So, we will use the following sequence to reset the requested
> device/function.
>
> - FLR (as first option)
> - BUS/SLOT reset (as fall-back option) if FLR is not supported or any
> issue with FLR
It looks to me as if the slot
On 11/29/2017 12:05 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:25:09AM -0600, Govinda Tatti wrote:
Furthermore, contrary to what you claim in
your reply to Pasi, I can't see where you try an actual FLR first -
you go straight to pci_probe_reset_{slot,bus}(). If you actually
tried
Thanks Konrad for your response. Please see below for my comments.
Well, that's more a question to Konrad as the maintainer.
Personally I'd prefer just "reset", as "pci" is redundant and "bus"
Can't do 'reset'.
Why?
B/c I forgot that this attribute is not per device, but on the module
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:40:20AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 29.11.17 at 17:29, wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:35:33AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 29.11.17 at 16:08, wrote:
> >> > On 11/9/2017 2:28 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:25:09AM -0600, Govinda Tatti wrote:
>
> >>>Furthermore, contrary to what you claim in
> >>>your reply to Pasi, I can't see where you try an actual FLR first -
> >>>you go straight to pci_probe_reset_{slot,bus}(). If you actually
> >>>tried FLR first, only falling back
Furthermore, contrary to what you claim in
your reply to Pasi, I can't see where you try an actual FLR first -
you go straight to pci_probe_reset_{slot,bus}(). If you actually
tried FLR first, only falling back to the other methods as "emulation",
I could certainly agree with the file name
>>> On 29.11.17 at 16:08, wrote:
> On 11/9/2017 2:28 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 08.11.17 at 16:44, wrote:
>>> On 11/7/2017 8:40 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 06.11.17 at 18:48, wrote:
> ---
Jan,
Sorry for the late response. Please see below for my comments.
On 11/9/2017 2:28 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.11.17 at 16:44, wrote:
On 11/7/2017 8:40 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.11.17 at 18:48, wrote:
---