On 10/19/20 6:43 PM, Rich Persaud wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2020, at 11:52, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
>>
>> Den 19.10.2020 17:16, skrev Håkon Alstadheim:
>>> Den 19.10.2020 13:00, skrev George Dunlap:
> On Jan 31, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 02:13:04PM
On Oct 19, 2020, at 11:52, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
>
>
> Den 19.10.2020 17:16, skrev Håkon Alstadheim:
>> Den 19.10.2020 13:00, skrev George Dunlap:
>>>
On Jan 31, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 02:13:04PM -0500, Rich Persaud wrote:
> On Aug 26,
Den 19.10.2020 17:16, skrev Håkon Alstadheim:
Den 19.10.2020 13:00, skrev George Dunlap:
On Jan 31, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 02:13:04PM -0500, Rich Persaud wrote:
On Aug 26, 2019, at 17:08, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:32:45AM
Den 19.10.2020 13:00, skrev George Dunlap:
On Jan 31, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 02:13:04PM -0500, Rich Persaud wrote:
On Aug 26, 2019, at 17:08, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:32:45AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 10/3/18 11:51
> On Jan 31, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 02:13:04PM -0500, Rich Persaud wrote:
>> On Aug 26, 2019, at 17:08, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:32:45AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/3/18 11:51 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 02:13:04PM -0500, Rich Persaud wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2019, at 17:08, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:32:45AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>> On 10/3/18 11:51 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:05:26AM +0200,
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 02:13:04PM -0500, Rich Persaud wrote:
>On Aug 26, 2019, at 17:08, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> Hi,
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:32:45AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>On 10/3/18 11:51 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 19,
On Aug 26, 2019, at 17:08, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:32:45AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 10/3/18 11:51 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:05:26AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:09:53PM -0400, Boris
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:32:45AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/3/18 11:51 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:05:26AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:09:53PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>> On 9/18/18 5:32 AM, George Dunlap
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 08:40:29PM +0200, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
>
>
> Den 08. okt. 2018 16:32, skrev Boris Ostrovsky:
> >
> > Are these two patches still needed? ISTR they were written originally
> > to deal with guest trying to use device that was previously assigned to
> > another
On 10/3/18 11:51 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:05:26AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:09:53PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 9/18/18 5:32 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> Hi,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:05:26AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:09:53PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > On 9/18/18 5:32 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Sep 18, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:09:53PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 9/18/18 5:32 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> >
> >> On Sep 18, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:06:02PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>> What about the toolstack changes?
On 9/18/18 5:32 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
>
>> On Sep 18, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:06:02PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> What about the toolstack changes? Have they been accepted? I vaguely
>>> recall there was a discussion about those
> On Sep 18, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:06:02PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 9/16/18 7:43 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:32:11PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 12/18/2017 02:36 AM, Jan
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:06:02PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 9/16/18 7:43 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:32:11PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> On 12/18/2017 02:36 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 15.12.17 at 20:52, wrote:
> >>>
On 9/16/18 7:43 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:32:11PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 12/18/2017 02:36 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.12.17 at 20:52, wrote:
>>> +static int pcistub_device_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:32:11PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 12/18/2017 02:36 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.12.17 at 20:52, wrote:
> > +static int pcistub_device_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct xen_pcibk_dev_data *dev_data;
> > + bool
On 12/18/2017 02:36 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.12.17 at 20:52, wrote:
> +static int pcistub_device_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct xen_pcibk_dev_data *dev_data;
> + bool slot = false, bus = false;
> + struct pcistub_args arg = {};
>>> On 15.12.17 at 20:52, wrote:
+static int pcistub_device_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+ struct xen_pcibk_dev_data *dev_data;
+ bool slot = false, bus = false;
+ struct pcistub_args arg = {};
+
+ if (!dev)
+ return
Jan,
One quick update on pcie_flr() specific implementation. Please see below.
+static int pcistub_device_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+ struct xen_pcibk_dev_data *dev_data;
+ bool slot = false, bus = false;
+ struct pcistub_args arg = {};
+
+ if (!dev)
+
On 12/12/2017 9:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.12.17 at 15:48, wrote:
Thanks Jan for your review comments. Please see below for my comments.
First of all - can you please do something about your reply style?
HTML mail should be avoided. You'll see that the (plain
>>> On 12.12.17 at 15:48, wrote:
> Thanks Jan for your review comments. Please see below for my comments.
First of all - can you please do something about your reply style?
HTML mail should be avoided. You'll see that the (plain text) reply
as a result is rather hard to
Thanks Jan for your review comments. Please see below for my
comments.
On 12/8/2017 3:34 AM, Jan Beulich
wrote:
On 07.12.17 at 23:21, wrote:
Due to the
>>> On 07.12.17 at 23:21, wrote:
> Due to the complexity with the PCI lock we cannot do the reset when a
> device is bound ('echo $BDF > bind') or when unbound ('echo $BDF > unbind')
> as the pci_[slot|bus]_reset also takes the same lock resulting in a
> dead-lock.
It
25 matches
Mail list logo