On 2019/4/3 18:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 03.04.19 at 12:05, wrote:
I'm a little confused about which style to follow? In v3 series I
followed the style of the derived code. But in other patch you told me
to follow the Xen coding style, so in v4 series I changed the style to
match the bracing
>>> On 03.04.19 at 12:05, wrote:
> On 2019/4/3 16:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 30.03.19 at 11:42, wrote:
>>> +static void init_hygon(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long long value;
>>> +
>>> + /* Attempt to set LFENCE to be Dispatch Serialising. */
>>> + if
On 2019/4/3 16:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.03.19 at 11:42, wrote:
+static void init_hygon(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+ unsigned long long value;
+
+ /* Attempt to set LFENCE to be Dispatch Serialising. */
+ if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_DE_CFG, value))
+ /* Unable to
>>> On 30.03.19 at 11:42, wrote:
> +static void init_hygon(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> +{
> + unsigned long long value;
> +
> + /* Attempt to set LFENCE to be Dispatch Serialising. */
> + if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_DE_CFG, value))
> + /* Unable to read. Assume the safer
On 2019/4/2 20:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 30/03/2019 10:42, Pu Wen wrote:
>> +static const struct cpu_dev hygon_cpu_dev = {
>> +.c_vendor = "Hygon",
>> +.c_ident= { "HygonGenuine" },
>> +.c_early_init = early_init_amd,
>> +.c_init = init_hygon,
>> +};
>>
On 30/03/2019 10:42, Pu Wen wrote:
> +static const struct cpu_dev hygon_cpu_dev = {
> + .c_vendor = "Hygon",
> + .c_ident= { "HygonGenuine" },
> + .c_early_init = early_init_amd,
> + .c_init = init_hygon,
> +};
> +
> +int __init hygon_init_cpu(void)
> +{
> +
