On 12/7/2018 7:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/12/18 14:58, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 07/12/2018 14:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/12/18 14:50, Juergen Gross wrote:
The PVH boot entry is in the same bzImage binary as the normal one.
Its just another entry, similar to the Xen PV boot entry. So
On 07/12/18 14:58, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 07/12/2018 14:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 07/12/18 14:50, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> The PVH boot entry is in the same bzImage binary as the normal one.
>>> Its just another entry, similar to the Xen PV boot entry. So the binary
>>>
On 07/12/2018 14:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/12/18 14:50, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> The PVH boot entry is in the same bzImage binary as the normal one.
>> Its just another entry, similar to the Xen PV boot entry. So the binary
>> arch/x86/boot/bzimage can be booted either on bare metal via
On 07/12/18 14:50, Juergen Gross wrote:
> The PVH boot entry is in the same bzImage binary as the normal one.
> Its just another entry, similar to the Xen PV boot entry. So the binary
> arch/x86/boot/bzimage can be booted either on bare metal via grub2 or
> other boot-loaders, as Xen PV-guest, as
On 07/12/2018 14:41, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/12/18 07:02, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 06/12/2018 23:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 06/12/18 07:04, Maran Wilson wrote:
+config PVH
+ bool "Support for running PVH guests"
+ ---help---
+This option enables the PVH entry
On 07/12/18 07:02, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 06/12/2018 23:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 06/12/18 07:04, Maran Wilson wrote:
>>> +config PVH
>>> + bool "Support for running PVH guests"
>>> + ---help---
>>> + This option enables the PVH entry point for guest virtual machines
>>> + as
On 06/12/2018 23:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/12/18 07:04, Maran Wilson wrote:
>> +config PVH
>> +bool "Support for running PVH guests"
>> +---help---
>> + This option enables the PVH entry point for guest virtual machines
>> + as specified in the x86/HVM direct boot ABI.
>>
On 06/12/2018 23:30, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/12/18 00:11, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 12/6/18 5:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 06/12/18 23:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 12/6/18 5:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> and also
>
> depends on !EFI
>
> because even
On 07/12/18 00:11, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 12/6/18 5:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 06/12/18 23:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 12/6/18 5:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
and also
depends on !EFI
because even though in principle it would be possible to write a
On 12/6/18 5:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/12/18 23:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 12/6/18 5:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>> and also
>>>
>>> depends on !EFI
>>>
>>> because even though in principle it would be possible to write a PVH
>>> loader for UEFI, PVH's start info does not
On 06/12/18 23:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 12/6/18 5:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 06/12/18 07:04, Maran Wilson wrote:
>>> +config PVH
>>> + bool "Support for running PVH guests"
>>> + ---help---
>>> + This option enables the PVH entry point for guest virtual machines
>>> + as
On 12/6/18 5:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/12/18 07:04, Maran Wilson wrote:
>> +config PVH
>> +bool "Support for running PVH guests"
>> +---help---
>> + This option enables the PVH entry point for guest virtual machines
>> + as specified in the x86/HVM direct boot ABI.
>> +
On 06/12/18 07:04, Maran Wilson wrote:
> +config PVH
> + bool "Support for running PVH guests"
> + ---help---
> + This option enables the PVH entry point for guest virtual machines
> + as specified in the x86/HVM direct boot ABI.
> +
IIUC this breaks "normal" bzImage boot, so
13 matches
Mail list logo
