On 27/03/2020 08:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 27.03.2020 09:10, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> On 27.03.20 00:24, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>>> On 26/03/2020 09:19, Juergen Gross wrote:
Some keyhandlers are calling process_pending_softirqs() while holding
a rcu_read_lock(). This is wrong, as
On 27.03.20 09:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.03.2020 09:10, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 27.03.20 00:24, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
On 26/03/2020 09:19, Juergen Gross wrote:
Some keyhandlers are calling process_pending_softirqs() while holding
a rcu_read_lock(). This is wrong, as
On 27.03.2020 09:10, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 27.03.20 00:24, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>> On 26/03/2020 09:19, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> Some keyhandlers are calling process_pending_softirqs() while holding
>>> a rcu_read_lock(). This is wrong, as process_pending_softirqs() might
>>> activate rcu calls
On 27.03.20 00:24, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
On 26/03/2020 09:19, Juergen Gross wrote:
Some keyhandlers are calling process_pending_softirqs() while holding
a rcu_read_lock(). This is wrong, as process_pending_softirqs() might
activate rcu calls which should not happen inside a rcu_read_lock().
On 26/03/2020 09:19, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Some keyhandlers are calling process_pending_softirqs() while holding
> a rcu_read_lock(). This is wrong, as process_pending_softirqs() might
> activate rcu calls which should not happen inside a rcu_read_lock().
>
> For that purpose modify
