Hi Artem,
On 19/11/2019 15:16, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
Unfortunately this is not the case - we need to specify 2 different
targets: 1st is for GNU tools which are still used when building with
armclang, for debug symbols dumping etc. (there is no replacement in
Arm toolstack for them, and this is
Hi Julien
On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 06:18 +, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> On 14/11/2019 14:12, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
> > Hello Julien
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 08:19 +0900, Julien Grall wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, 02:15 Artem Mygaiev, <
> > > artem_myga...@epam.com
> > > >
On 14/11/2019 14:12, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
Hello Julien
Hi,
On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 08:19 +0900, Julien Grall wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, 02:15 Artem Mygaiev, <
artem_myga...@epam.com> wrote:
Hi Jan,
Sorry for delayed reply
On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 08:31 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On
Hello Julien
On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 08:19 +0900, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, 02:15 Artem Mygaiev, <
> artem_myga...@epam.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > Sorry for delayed reply
> >
> > On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 08:31 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > On 06.11.2019 23:08, Artem
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, 02:15 Artem Mygaiev, wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Sorry for delayed reply
>
> On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 08:31 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 06.11.2019 23:08, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 4:28 PM Jan Beulich <
> > > jbeul...@suse.com
> > > > wrote:
> > > > On
Hi Jan,
Sorry for delayed reply
On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 08:31 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.11.2019 23:08, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 4:28 PM Jan Beulich <
> > jbeul...@suse.com
> > > wrote:
> > > On 06.11.2019 10:19, Andrii Anisov wrote:
> > > > --- a/Config.mk
> > > >
On 06.11.2019 23:08, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 4:28 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.11.2019 10:19, Andrii Anisov wrote:
>>> --- a/Config.mk
>>> +++ b/Config.mk
>>> @@ -221,7 +221,9 @@ CFLAGS += -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
>>>
>>> $(call
Hello Jan
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 4:28 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 06.11.2019 10:19, Andrii Anisov wrote:
> > From: Artem Mygaiev
> >
> > Still have linker issues
>
> This may be acceptable for an RFC series, but doesn't justify there
> not being any other description. Just to give an
On 06.11.2019 10:19, Andrii Anisov wrote:
> From: Artem Mygaiev
>
> Still have linker issues
This may be acceptable for an RFC series, but doesn't justify there
not being any other description. Just to give an example,I'd like to
understand why ...
> --- a/Config.mk
> +++ b/Config.mk
> @@
