On 1/30/21 6:59 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 09:08 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
On 1/26/21 11:31 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
Thanks again for letting us see these logs.
Thanks for the attention to this :-)
Any ideas for how to solve it?
So, you're up for testing patches,
On 03.02.21 12:20, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 03/02/2021 11:00, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 03.02.21 10:19, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 03/02/2021 07:31, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 15:23 +, Julien Grall wrote:
In reality, it is probably still too early as a pCPU can be
Hi Juergen,
On 03/02/2021 11:00, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 03.02.21 10:19, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 03/02/2021 07:31, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 15:23 +, Julien Grall wrote:
In reality, it is probably still too early as a pCPU can be
considered
quiesced until a call to rcu
On 03.02.21 10:19, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 03/02/2021 07:31, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 15:23 +, Julien Grall wrote:
In reality, it is probably still too early as a pCPU can be
considered
quiesced until a call to rcu_lock*() (such rcu_lock_domain()).
Well, yes, in the
Hi,
On 03/02/2021 07:31, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 15:23 +, Julien Grall wrote:
In reality, it is probably still too early as a pCPU can be
considered
quiesced until a call to rcu_lock*() (such rcu_lock_domain()).
Well, yes, in theory, we could track down which is the fi
Hi again,
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 15:23 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> (Adding Andrew, Jan, Juergen for visibility)
>
Thanks! :-)
> On 02/02/2021 15:03, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 07:59 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > The placement in enter_hypervisor_from_guest() doesn't matt
(Adding Andrew, Jan, Juergen for visibility)
Hi Dario,
On 02/02/2021 15:03, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 07:59 +, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Dario,
I have had a quick look at your place. The RCU call in
leave_hypervisor_to_guest() needs to be placed just after the last
call
to
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 07:59 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Dario,
>
Hi!
> I have had a quick look at your place. The RCU call in
> leave_hypervisor_to_guest() needs to be placed just after the last
> call
> to check_for_pcpu_work().
>
> Otherwise, you may be preempted and keep the RCU quiet.
Hi Dario,
On 30/01/2021 17:59, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 09:08 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
On 1/26/21 11:31 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
Thanks again for letting us see these logs.
Thanks for the attention to this :-)
Any ideas for how to solve it?
So, you're up for test
On 1/30/21 6:59 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 09:08 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
On 1/26/21 11:31 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
Thanks again for letting us see these logs.
Thanks for the attention to this :-)
Any ideas for how to solve it?
So, you're up for testing patches,
On 1/29/21 11:16 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 09:18 +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 29.01.21 09:08, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
So it using it has only downsides (and that's true in general, if
you
ask me, but particularly so if using NULL).
Thanks for the feedback.
I removed dom0_
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 09:08 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
> On 1/26/21 11:31 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > Thanks again for letting us see these logs.
>
> Thanks for the attention to this :-)
>
> Any ideas for how to solve it?
>
So, you're up for testing patches, right?
How about applying thes
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 09:18 +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 29.01.21 09:08, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
> > >
> > > So it using it has only downsides (and that's true in general, if
> > > you
> > > ask me, but particularly so if using NULL).
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> > I removed dom0_vcpus_pin. An
On 29.01.21 09:08, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
On 1/26/21 11:31 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 18:03 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
On 1/25/21 5:11 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 14:26 +, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Anders,
On 22/01/2021 08:06, Anders Törnqvist w
On 1/26/21 11:31 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 18:03 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
On 1/25/21 5:11 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 14:26 +, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Anders,
On 22/01/2021 08:06, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
On 1/22/21 12:35 AM, Dario Faggioli w
On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 18:03 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
> On 1/25/21 5:11 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 14:26 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Hi Anders,
> > >
> > > On 22/01/2021 08:06, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
> > > > On 1/22/21 12:35 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > > > > O
On 1/25/21 5:11 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 14:26 +, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Anders,
On 22/01/2021 08:06, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
On 1/22/21 12:35 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 19:40 +, Julien Grall wrote:
- booting with "sched=null vwfi=native" b
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 14:26 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Anders,
>
> On 22/01/2021 08:06, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
> > On 1/22/21 12:35 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 19:40 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> > - booting with "sched=null vwfi=native" but not doing the IRQ
> > pa
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 18:44 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
> Listing vcpus looks like this when the domain is running:
>
> xl vcpu-list
> Name ID VCPU CPU State Time(s)
> Affinity (Hard / Soft)
> Domain-0 0 0 0 r-- 101.7
On 1/22/21 3:26 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Anders,
On 22/01/2021 08:06, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
On 1/22/21 12:35 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 19:40 +, Julien Grall wrote:
- booting with "sched=null vwfi=native" but not doing the IRQ
passthrough that you mentioned above
On 1/22/21 3:02 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Dario,
On 21/01/2021 23:35, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 19:40 +, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Dario,
Hi!
On 21/01/2021 18:32, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 11:54 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
https://lists.xenproject
Hi Anders,
On 22/01/2021 08:06, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
On 1/22/21 12:35 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 19:40 +, Julien Grall wrote:
- booting with "sched=null vwfi=native" but not doing the IRQ
passthrough that you mentioned above
"xl destroy" gives
(XEN) End of domain_d
Hi Dario,
On 21/01/2021 23:35, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 19:40 +, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Dario,
Hi!
On 21/01/2021 18:32, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 11:54 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2018-09/m
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 09:06 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
> On 1/22/21 12:35 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>
>
> - booting with "sched=null" but not with "vwfi=native"
> Without "vwfi=native" it works fine to destroy and to re-create the
> domain.
> Both printouts comes after a destroy:
> (XEN) End
On 1/21/21 7:32 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 11:54 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
I see a problem with destroy and restart of a domain. Interrupts are
not
available when trying to restart a domain.
The situation seems very similar to the thread "null scheduler
Thanks for the responses.
On 1/22/21 12:35 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 19:40 +, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Dario,
Hi!
On 21/01/2021 18:32, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 11:54 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 19:40 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Dario,
>
Hi!
> On 21/01/2021 18:32, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 11:54 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
> > >
> > > https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2018-09/msg01213.html
> > > .
> > >
> > Right.
Hi Dario,
On 21/01/2021 18:32, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 11:54 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
Hi,
I see a problem with destroy and restart of a domain. Interrupts are
not
available when trying to restart a domain.
The situation seems very similar to the thread "null scheduler
On 21/01/2021 10:54, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
Hi,
Hi Anders,
Thank you for reporting the bug. I am adding Stefano and Dario as IIRC
they were going to work on a solution.
Cheers,
I see a problem with destroy and restart of a domain. Interrupts are not
available when trying to restart a
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 11:54 +0100, Anders Törnqvist wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hello,
> I see a problem with destroy and restart of a domain. Interrupts are
> not
> available when trying to restart a domain.
>
> The situation seems very similar to the thread "null scheduler bug"
>
> https://lists.xenpro
30 matches
Mail list logo