On Wed, 16 Oct 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> virt_to_maddr() is using the hardware page-table walk instructions to
> translate a virtual address to physical address. The function should
> only be called on virtual address mapped.
>
> _end points past the end of Xen binary and may not be mapped when
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.13] xen/arm: Don't use _end in
> is_xen_fixed_mfn()"):
> > My suggestion is going to work: "the compiler sees through casts"
> > referred to comparisons between pointers, where we temporarily casted
> > both
flight 142783 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142783/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.
140282
Anthony and Roger, thanks for your informative responses. It helped a lot.
> I'm however unsure by what you mean with instance, so you might have
> to clarify exactly what you mean in order to get a more concise
> reply.
Let's say there are two DomU's, and their respective network interfaces
On 10/16/19 8:11 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 15.10.19 20:12, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> From: Jason Gunthorpe
>>
>> DMA_SHARED_BUFFER can not be enabled by the user (it represents a
>> library
>> set in the kernel). The kconfig convention is to use select for such
>> symbols so they are turned on
flight 142762 linux-4.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142762/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim 20 guest-start/debian.repeat fail in 142736 REGR.
vs. 139698
Tests
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 01:51:04PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> These are all functions which are invoked from elsewhere, so annotate
> them as global using the new SYM_FUNC_START. And their ENDPROC's by
> SYM_FUNC_END.
>
> And make sure ENTRY/ENDPROC is not defined on X86_64, given these were
On 10/16/19 11:31 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> On 16/10/2019 11:22, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/16/19 11:18 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.13] xen/arm: Don't use
>>> _end in is_xen_fixed_mfn()"):
My suggestion is going to work: "the
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 6:39 PM Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:55:32PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Roger Pau Monne writes ("Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] libxl: add removing XS backend
> > path for PV devices on domain destroy"):
> > > When this code was added (devd) those where
Hi,
On 16/10/2019 11:18, Ian Jackson wrote:
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.13] xen/arm: Don't use _end in
is_xen_fixed_mfn()"):
My suggestion is going to work: "the compiler sees through casts"
referred to comparisons between pointers, where we temporarily casted
both pointers
On 16.10.19 13:19, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
Argh forgot again. Maybe the 3rd will be better?
Yes! You made it! ;-)
Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
On 15/10/2019 17:36, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
I actually forgot to CC Juergen. No wonder why I had no answer :(.
Cheers,
On 10/10/19 3:51 PM,
On 10/16/19 11:41 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 16.10.19 12:38, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/16/19 11:31 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi George,
>>>
>>> On 16/10/2019 11:22, George Dunlap wrote:
On 10/16/19 11:18 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.13]
virt_to_maddr() is using the hardware page-table walk instructions to
translate a virtual address to physical address. The function should
only be called on virtual address mapped.
_end points past the end of Xen binary and may not be mapped when the
binary size is page-aligned. This means
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 17:34, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> The IRQ Route Control registers definitions belong to the PIIX
> chipset. We were only defining the 'A' register. Define the other
> B, C and D registers, and use them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Xen change...
On 16.10.19 12:38, George Dunlap wrote:
On 10/16/19 11:31 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi George,
On 16/10/2019 11:22, George Dunlap wrote:
On 10/16/19 11:18 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.13] xen/arm: Don't use
_end in is_xen_fixed_mfn()"):
My suggestion is
The current size of Xen is computed using _end - _start + 1. However,
_end is pointing one past the end of Xen, so the size of Xen is
off-by-one.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
---
xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c
On 16.10.19 13:12, Julien Grall wrote:
The current size of Xen is computed using _end - _start + 1. However,
_end is pointing one past the end of Xen, so the size of Xen is
off-by-one.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
Release-acked-by: Juergen Gross
Juergen
On 10/16/19 11:18 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.13] xen/arm: Don't use _end in
> is_xen_fixed_mfn()"):
>> My suggestion is going to work: "the compiler sees through casts"
>> referred to comparisons between pointers, where we temporarily casted
>> both
Hi George,
On 16/10/2019 11:38, George Dunlap wrote:
On 10/16/19 11:31 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 16/10/2019 11:22, George Dunlap wrote:
On 10/16/19 11:18 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.13] xen/arm: Don't use
_end in is_xen_fixed_mfn()"):
My suggestion
Hi,
Argh forgot again. Maybe the 3rd will be better?
Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
On 15/10/2019 17:36, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
I actually forgot to CC Juergen. No wonder why I had no answer :(.
Cheers,
On 10/10/19 3:51 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
+Juergen
On 03/10/2019 02:22, Stefano
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
We always skip the IOMMU device when creating DT for hwdom if there is
an appropriate driver for it in Xen (device_get_class(iommu_node)
returns DEVICE_IOMMU). So, even if it is not used by Xen it will be skipped.
We should also skip the IOMMU specific properties of
CC libxl maintainers
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:02:33PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> While testing xen-unstable 4.13.0-rc0 I ran in to the following issue:
>
> When passing through all 8 functions of a pci(e) device I can't start the
> guest anymore, note that the trouble
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.13] xen/arm: Don't use _end in
is_xen_fixed_mfn()"):
> My suggestion is going to work: "the compiler sees through casts"
> referred to comparisons between pointers, where we temporarily casted
> both pointers to integers and back to pointers via a
Hi George,
On 16/10/2019 11:22, George Dunlap wrote:
On 10/16/19 11:18 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.13] xen/arm: Don't use _end in
is_xen_fixed_mfn()"):
My suggestion is going to work: "the compiler sees through casts"
referred to comparisons between
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:53:55PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to very limited space in the setup_header this patch series introduces new
> kernel_info struct which will be used to convey information from the kernel to
> the bootloader. This way the boot protocol can be extended
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:04 PM Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> Oleksandr Grytsov writes ("Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] libxl: introduce new backend
> type VINPUT"):
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 5:58 PM Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > I think it was a48e00f14a2d "libxl: add backend type and id to vkb"
> > > which
Hi Oleksandr,
On 16/10/2019 15:04, Oleksandr Grytsov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:21 PM Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 11/10/2019 16:23, Ian Jackson wrote:
Oleksandr Grytsov writes ("[PATCH v1] libxl: Add DTB compatible list to
config file"):
flight 142777 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142777/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs.
142750
Hi Hongyan,
On 11/10/2019 10:53, Xia, Hongyan wrote:
Not commenting on the patch, but I had exactly the same problem when
removing the direct map in x86. map_domain_page has to be usable
without the direct map and even before alloc_boot_pages can be used (so
that I can map the
flight 142802 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142802/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen 55ab292c42db41b05cfdba012680bf1e0ea02f7a
baseline version:
xen
Hi Julien,
Sure. You should be able to find it on directnonmap-v2.3 branch at
https://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/people/hx242/xen.git.
Commit: a4fef31b99388524d3f7748967c5d04a924cb7e3
x86: add Persistent Map (PMAP) infrastructure
One thing to note is that the PMAP structure is really
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:21 PM Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 11/10/2019 16:23, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Oleksandr Grytsov writes ("[PATCH v1] libxl: Add DTB compatible list to
> > > config file"):
> > > > From: Oleksandr Grytsov
> > >
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:12 PM Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Oleksandr,
>
> On 16/10/2019 15:04, Oleksandr Grytsov wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:21 PM Stefano Stabellini
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 11/10/2019 16:23, Ian Jackson
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:28 PM Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 11/10/2019 16:14, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Oleksandr Grytsov writes ("[PATCH v1] Reset iomem's gfn to
> > LIBXL_INVALID_GFN on reboot"):
> >> During domain reboot its configuration is partially reused
> >> to re-create a new
Dear Community members,
I am pleased to announce that Julien Grallh has been nominated and
voted to become a new member of the Xen Project security team.
Julien has made significant contributions to the Xen Project over the
years and has been a maintainer and project leadership team member
flight 142803 freebsd-master real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/142803/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-freebsd 7 freebsd-buildfail REGR. vs. 141501
Tests which did
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:31:06 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 03:14:03PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Could you review this version?
>
> These look good to me; shall I merge them or what was the plan?
Thanks for the review, yes, could you
Hi,
On 16/10/2019 15:34, Oleksandr Grytsov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:12 PM Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
On 16/10/2019 15:04, Oleksandr Grytsov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:21 PM Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 11/10/2019 16:23,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> The current size of Xen is computed using _end - _start + 1. However,
> _end is pointing one past the end of Xen, so the size of Xen is
> off-by-one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 2
> On Oct 15, 2019, at 08:27, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
On 15 Oct 2019, at 02:58, Rich Persaud wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2019, at 07:11, Lars Kurth wrote:
>>> On 11/10/2019, 02:24, "Stefano Stabellini" wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Lars Kurth wrote:
@Stefano: as you and I
40 matches
Mail list logo
