On 18/04/2020 12:01, Julien Grall wrote:
On 26/03/2020 15:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.03.2020 17:14, jul...@xen.org wrote:
From: Julien Grall
Note that the code is now using cr3_to_mfn() to get the MFN. This is
slightly different as the top 12-bits will now be masked.
And here I agree
At 16:23 +0200 on 17 Apr (1587140581), Jan Beulich wrote:
> Large parts of this series are to further isolate pieces which
> are needed for HVM only, and hence would better not be built
> with HVM=n. But there are also a few other items which I've
> noticed along the road.
Acked-by: Tim Deegan
At 16:28 +0200 on 17 Apr (1587140897), Jan Beulich wrote:
> sh_remove_write_access() bails early for !external guests, and hence its
> building and thus the need for the hook can be suppressed altogether in
> !HVM configs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
> @@ -366,6 +367,14 @@ int
Hi Jan,
On 16/04/2020 16:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
@@ -2151,16 +2151,17 @@ static int mod_l1_entry(l1_pgentry_t *pl
paging_mode_translate(pg_dom) )
{
p2m_type_t p2mt;
+unsigned long gfn =
At 16:26 +0200 on 17 Apr (1587140817), Jan Beulich wrote:
> Consolidate the shadow_mode_external() in here: Check this once at the
> start of the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
> @@ -3707,34 +3707,30 @@
On 26/03/2020 15:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.03.2020 17:14, jul...@xen.org wrote:
From: Julien Grall
Note that the code is now using cr3_to_mfn() to get the MFN. This is
slightly different as the top 12-bits will now be masked.
And here I agree with the change. Hence it is even more so
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 03:24:30PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Create a new document under docs/process to describe our special tags.
> Add a description of the Fixes tag and the new Backport tag. Also
> clarify that lines with tags should not be split.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano
flight 149703 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149703/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-examine4 memdisk-try-append fail in 149697 pass in 149703
Hi,
On 18/04/2020 00:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
The title claim this is a resend, but this is actually not the latest
version of this patch. Can you explain why you decided to use v1
rather than v2?
Because v2 added a printk for every read,
Hi,
On 30/03/2020 08:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.03.2020 11:52, Julien Grall wrote:
On 26/03/2020 15:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.03.2020 17:14, jul...@xen.org wrote:
@@ -3116,24 +3116,24 @@ int vcpu_destroy_pagetables(struct vcpu *v)
/* Free that page if non-zero */
do {
-
Hi Jan,
On 26/03/2020 15:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.03.2020 17:14, jul...@xen.org wrote:
From: Julien Grall
We are using the 'mfn' to refer to machine frame. As this function deal
with 'mfn', replace 'pfn' with 'mfn'.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
---
I am not entirely sure to understand
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:50:01PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Downstreams may want this for either security or performance reasons. Offer
> some options, and take advantage of some of the very low hanging fruit it
> offers.
>
> There is plenty more incremental cleanup which can be done at a
12 matches
Mail list logo
