Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/7] xen: xsm: flask: introduce XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_share for memory sharing

>>> On 24.02.18 at 06:37, wrote: > ... Sorry for the incomplete mail. I somehow hit the "send" button before I > finish composing the previous mail. And now it continues... > > 2018-02-24 10:50 GMT+08:00 Zhongze Liu : >> Hi Jan, >> >> (Last week was

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/PV: fix off-by-one in I/O bitmap limit check

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-priv-op.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-priv-op.c @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static bool guest_io_okay(unsigned int p if ( iopl_ok(v, regs) ) return true; -if ( v->arch.pv_vcpu.iobmp_limit > (port + bytes) ) +

Re: [Xen-devel] ARM64:Porting xen to new hardware

Regards, Bharat Gohil On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > Please configure your e-mail client to quote with '>'. It is incredibly > difficult to read e-mail when space is used for quoting (see below). > > > On 22/02/18 10:33, bharat gohil wrote:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/xenstore: try to get minimum thread stack size for watch thread

On 24/02/18 02:22, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 02/22/2018 06:53 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >> When creating a pthread in xs_watch() try to get the minimal needed >> size of the thread from glibc instead of using a constant. This avoids >> problems when the library is used in programs with large

Re: [Xen-devel] [v1 1/1] xen, mm: Allow deferred page initialization for xen pv domains

On 24/02/18 00:25, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > Juergen Gross noticed that commit > f7f99100d8d ("mm: stop zeroing memory during allocation in vmemmap") > broke XEN PV domains when deferred struct page initialization is enabled. > > This is because the xen's PagePinned() flag is getting erased from

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 02/10] arm64: Add hook to handle guest GICv3 sysreg accesses

On 02/26/2018 12:12 PM, Manish Jaggi wrote: On 02/01/2018 04:24 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Manish, On 01/02/18 08:51, Manish Jaggi wrote: On 01/25/2018 11:37 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, I forgot to mention one thing about the placement of do_fixup_vgic_errata. On 16/01/18 15:42,

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 02/10] arm64: Add hook to handle guest GICv3 sysreg accesses

On 02/01/2018 04:24 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Manish, On 01/02/18 08:51, Manish Jaggi wrote: On 01/25/2018 11:37 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, I forgot to mention one thing about the placement of do_fixup_vgic_errata. On 16/01/18 15:42, mja...@caviumnetworks.com wrote: diff --git

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 120004: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 120004 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120004/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 119943 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 13

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 00/10] x86 passthrough code cleanup

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:39:20PM -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On 2/22/18 11:12 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote: > >> From: Wei Liu > >> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 5:47 AM > >> > >> Hi all > >> > >> At some point I would like to make CONFIG_HVM and CONFIG_PV work. > >> The > >> passthrough code is

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 119995: regressions - FAIL

flight 119995 xen-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/119995/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-pvopsbroken in 119952 build-armhf-pvops

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 119992: regressions - FAIL

flight 119992 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/119992/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-libvirt 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 118324

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 119996: all pass - PUSHED

flight 119996 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/119996/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf ebfca258f5d7ab59cd1b72ad56f1de0e7a138ba9 baseline version: ovmf

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 120008: regressions - ALL FAIL

flight 120008 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120008/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: coverity-amd647 coverity-upload fail REGR. vs. 119558 version

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 119983: regressions - FAIL

flight 119983 xen-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/119983/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 50 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail REGR. vs. 119227