[Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 138364: regressions - FAIL

2019-06-24 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138364 xen-4.8-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138364/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-prev 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 130965

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 138372: regressions - FAIL

2019-06-24 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138372 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138372/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 137600 build-amd64-xsm

Re: [Xen-devel] How to compile Xen 4.12 with Clang on Linux?

2019-06-24 Thread Johnson, Ethan
On 6/20/19 7:01 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Xen itself doesn't use autoconf, and needs a bit of extra help getting > its options in order.  There is an extra clang=y variable which you need > to pass. > > xen.git$ make -C xen/ CC=clang-7 clang=y Thanks! That seems to have worked. Now I've got a

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.19 test] 138353: regressions - FAIL

2019-06-24 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138353 linux-4.19 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138353/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-pvops 6 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 129313

Re: [Xen-devel] Migrating key developer docs to xen.git sphinx docs and refreshing them in the process

2019-06-24 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On 6/24/19 9:23 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 24/06/2019 19:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > I think we all agree

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: io: add function swap_mmio_handler()

2019-06-24 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 6/24/19 9:17 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > > > Hi Stefano, > > > > > > On 24/06/2019 19:27, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 13

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: io: add function swap_mmio_handler()

2019-06-24 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 6/24/19 9:17 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Stefano, On 24/06/2019 19:27, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, chenbaodong wrote: Let me add that if you prefer to document one of the

Re: [Xen-devel] Migrating key developer docs to xen.git sphinx docs and refreshing them in the process

2019-06-24 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Stefano, On 6/24/19 9:23 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 24/06/2019 19:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Lars Kurth wrote: I think we all agree by now that maintaining up-to-date docs on the wiki and keeping them in sync with

Re: [Xen-devel] Migrating key developer docs to xen.git sphinx docs and refreshing them in the process

2019-06-24 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/06/2019 19:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Lars Kurth wrote: > > I think we all agree by now that maintaining up-to-date docs on the wiki > > and keeping them in sync with code changes is hard. I see moving things > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: io: add function swap_mmio_handler()

2019-06-24 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On 24/06/2019 19:27, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >> On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, chenbaodong wrote: > > Let me add that if you prefer to document one of the other interfaces > > listed above in

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 138348: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2019-06-24 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138348 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138348/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stopfail like 138207

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: io: add function swap_mmio_handler()

2019-06-24 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Stefano, On 24/06/2019 19:27, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, chenbaodong wrote: > Let me add that if you prefer to document one of the other interfaces > listed above in my email, you are welcome to pick another one. For >

Re: [Xen-devel] PCI Passthrough bug with x86 HVM

2019-06-24 Thread Stefano Stabellini
+ xen-devel On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Hi all, > > I might have found a bug with PCI passthrough to a Linux HVM guest on > x86 with Xen 4.12. It is not easy for me to get access, and especially > change components, on this particular system, and I don't have access to >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: io: add function swap_mmio_handler()

2019-06-24 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, chenbaodong wrote: > > > > But currently i don't understand xen well, only a few weeks experience. > > > > > > We do have small task for newcomers that would improve Xen code base and > > > also allow your to understand more

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/ubsan: Don't perform alignment checking on supporting compilers

2019-06-24 Thread Andrew Cooper
GCC 5 introduced -fsanitize=alignment which is enabled by default by CONFIG_UBSAN. This trips a load of wont-fix cases in the ACPI tables and the hypercall page and stubs writing logic. It also causes the native Xen boot to crash before the console is set up, for an as-yet unidentified reason

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: io: add function swap_mmio_handler()

2019-06-24 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, chenbaodong wrote: > > > But currently i don't understand xen well, only a few weeks experience. > > > > We do have small task for newcomers that would improve Xen code base and > > also allow your to understand more some part of the code. > > > > If you have a specific area

Re: [Xen-devel] Migrating key developer docs to xen.git sphinx docs and refreshing them in the process

2019-06-24 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Lars Kurth wrote: > Hi all, > > since Andy created https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/sphinx-unstable/ and > https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/sphinx-unstable-staging/ (sources in > docs/hypervisor-guide, docs/guest-guide, docs/admin-guide) I was wondering > whether it would not make

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] page-alloc: Clamp get_free_buddy() to online nodes

2019-06-24 Thread Andrew Cooper
d->node_affinity defaults to NODE_MASK_ALL which has bits set outside of node_online_map. This in turn causes the loop in get_free_buddy() to waste effort iterating over offline nodes. Always clamp d->node_affinity to node_online_map when in use. This in turn involves implementing nodes_copy()

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add Volodymyr as Reviewer for xen/arm

2019-06-24 Thread Volodymyr Babchuk
Hi Stefano, Stefano Stabellini writes: > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini Acked-by: Volodymyr Babchuk > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 313df52494..882e4efa22 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ F:tools/libxc/xc_arinc653.c > ARM (W/

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add Volodymyr as Reviewer for xen/arm

2019-06-24 Thread Stefano Stabellini
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 313df52494..882e4efa22 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ F: tools/libxc/xc_arinc653.c ARM (W/ VIRTUALISATION EXTENSIONS) ARCHITECTURE M: Stefano Stabellini M: Julien Grall

Re: [Xen-devel] [PULL 0/8] xen queue 2019-06-24

2019-06-24 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190624153257.20163-1-anthony.per...@citrix.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Message-id: 20190624153257.20163-1-anthony.per...@citrix.com Subject: [Xen-devel] [PULL 0/8] xen queue

Re: [Xen-devel] [PULL 0/8] xen queue 2019-06-24

2019-06-24 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190624153257.20163-1-anthony.per...@citrix.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Message-id: 20190624153257.20163-1-anthony.per...@citrix.com Type: series Subject: [Xen-devel] [PULL 0/8]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PULL 0/8] xen queue 2019-06-24

2019-06-24 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190624153257.20163-1-anthony.per...@citrix.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Message-id: 20190624153257.20163-1-anthony.per...@citrix.com Subject: [Xen-devel] [PULL 0/8] xen queue

Re: [Xen-devel] [PULL 0/8] xen queue 2019-06-24

2019-06-24 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190624153257.20163-1-anthony.per...@citrix.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Subject: [Xen-devel] [PULL 0/8] xen queue 2019-06-24 Type: series Message-id:

[Xen-devel] UBSAN report in find_next_bit()

2019-06-24 Thread Andrew Cooper
Hello, One UBSAN report on x86 is: (XEN) (XEN) UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in /local/xen.git/xen/include/xen/nodemask.h:220:9 (XEN) shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int' (XEN) [

Re: [Xen-devel] [PULL 0/8] xen queue 2019-06-24

2019-06-24 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190624153257.20163-1-anthony.per...@citrix.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Message-id: 20190624153257.20163-1-anthony.per...@citrix.com Type: series Subject: [Xen-devel] [PULL 0/8]

[Xen-devel] [PULL 5/8] xen: Avoid VLA

2019-06-24 Thread Anthony PERARD
Avoid using a variable length array. We allocate the `dirty_bitmap' buffer only once when we start tracking for dirty bits. Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Message-Id: <20190618112341.513-5-anthony.per...@citrix.com> ---

[Xen-devel] [PULL 7/8] Revert xen/io/ring.h of "Clean up a few header guard symbols"

2019-06-24 Thread Anthony PERARD
This reverts changes to include/hw/xen/io/ring.h from commit 37677d7db39a3c250ad661d00fb7c3b59d047b1f. Following 37677d7db3 "Clean up a few header guard symbols", QEMU start to fail to build: In file included from ~/xen/tools/../tools/include/xen/io/blkif.h:31:0, from

[Xen-devel] [PULL 1/8] xen-block: support feature-large-sector-size

2019-06-24 Thread Anthony PERARD
From: Paul Durrant A recent Xen commit [1] clarified the semantics of sector based quantities used in the blkif protocol such that it is now safe to create a xen-block device with a logical_block_size != 512, as long as the device only connects to a frontend advertizing

[Xen-devel] [PULL 2/8] xen-bus: use a separate fd for each event channel

2019-06-24 Thread Anthony PERARD
From: Paul Durrant To better support use of IOThread-s it will be necessary to be able to set the AioContext for each XenEventChannel and hence it is necessary to open a separate handle to libxenevtchan for each channel. This patch stops using NotifierList for event channel callbacks, replacing

[Xen-devel] [PULL 4/8] xen-bus / xen-block: add support for event channel polling

2019-06-24 Thread Anthony PERARD
From: Paul Durrant This patch introduces a poll callback for event channel fd-s and uses this to invoke the channel callback function. To properly support polling, it is necessary for the event channel callback function to return a boolean saying whether it has done any useful work or not. Thus

[Xen-devel] [PULL 3/8] xen-bus: allow AioContext to be specified for each event channel

2019-06-24 Thread Anthony PERARD
From: Paul Durrant This patch adds an AioContext parameter to xen_device_bind_event_channel() and then uses aio_set_fd_handler() to set the callback rather than qemu_set_fd_handler(). Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant Reviewed-by: Anthony PERARD Message-Id:

[Xen-devel] [PULL 6/8] xen: Drop includes of xen/hvm/params.h

2019-06-24 Thread Anthony PERARD
xen-mapcache.c doesn't needs params.h. xen-hvm.c uses defines available in params.h but so is xen_common.h which is included before. HVM_PARAM_* flags are only needed to make xc_hvm_param_{get,set} calls so including only xenctrl.h, which is where the definition the function is, should be enough.

[Xen-devel] [PULL 0/8] xen queue 2019-06-24

2019-06-24 Thread Anthony PERARD
-dm.git tags/pull-xen-20190624 for you to fetch changes up to a3434a2d56aee3018f4a0f55c7e0f0cda11f3d9e: xen: Import other xen/io/*.h (2019-06-24 10:42:30 +0100) Xen queue * Fix build * xen-block: support feature-large-sector-size

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 138333: regressions - FAIL

2019-06-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [xen-4.6-testing test] 138333: regressions - FAIL"): > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [xen-4.6-testing test] 138333: regressions - FAIL"): > > These all have `qemut' in common. > > I still think this is true (largely at least). > > > The corresponding tests in Xen 4.7 > > are

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 138333: regressions - FAIL

2019-06-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [xen-4.6-testing test] 138333: regressions - FAIL"): > These all have `qemut' in common. I still think this is true (largely at least). > The corresponding tests in Xen 4.7 > are all completey broken regardless of the qemu version... But this is wrong. Ian.

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 138333: regressions - FAIL

2019-06-24 Thread Ian Jackson
osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.6-testing test] 138333: regressions - FAIL"): > flight 138333 xen-4.6-testing real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138333/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] x86: Add nopv parameter to disable PV extensions

2019-06-24 Thread Zhenzhong Duan
On 2019/6/24 21:18, Juergen Gross wrote: On 23.06.19 15:01, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: In virtualization environment, PV extensions (drivers, interrupts, timers, etc) are enabled in the majority of use cases which is the best option. However, in some cases (kexec not fully working, benchmarking)

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 138424: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2019-06-24 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138424 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138424/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] x86: Add nopv parameter to disable PV extensions

2019-06-24 Thread Juergen Gross
On 23.06.19 15:01, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: In virtualization environment, PV extensions (drivers, interrupts, timers, etc) are enabled in the majority of use cases which is the best option. However, in some cases (kexec not fully working, benchmarking) we want to disable PV extensions. As such

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] x86: Add nopv parameter to disable PV extensions

2019-06-24 Thread Juergen Gross
On 23.06.19 15:01, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: In virtualization environment, PV extensions (drivers, interrupts, timers, etc) are enabled in the majority of use cases which is the best option. However, in some cases (kexec not fully working, benchmarking) we want to disable PV extensions. As such

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/6] Revert "xen: Introduce 'xen_nopv' to disable PV extensions for HVM guests."

2019-06-24 Thread Zhenzhong Duan
This reverts commit 8d693b911bb9c57009c24cb1772d205b84c7985c. Instead we use an unified parameter 'nopv' for all the hypervisor platforms. Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --- Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 4

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] x86: Add nopv parameter to disable PV extensions

2019-06-24 Thread Zhenzhong Duan
In virtualization environment, PV extensions (drivers, interrupts, timers, etc) are enabled in the majority of use cases which is the best option. However, in some cases (kexec not fully working, benchmarking) we want to disable PV extensions. As such introduce the 'nopv' parameter that will do

[Xen-devel] Migrating key developer docs to xen.git sphinx docs and refreshing them in the process

2019-06-24 Thread Lars Kurth
Hi all, since Andy created https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/sphinx-unstable/ and https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/sphinx-unstable-staging/ (sources in docs/hypervisor-guide, docs/guest-guide, docs/admin-guide) I was wondering whether it would not make sense to migrate some key documents in the wiki

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: Switch OMAP5 secondary cores into hyp mode

2019-06-24 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 24/06/2019 12:09, Julien Grall wrote: > (+ GSOC mentors and Andre) > > Hi Denis, > > Thank you for the patch. > > First of all, may I ask to CC the other mentors? > > On 6/21/19 9:02 PM, Denis Obrezkov wrote: >> This function allows xen to bring secondary CPU cores into non-secure >> HYP mode.

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 138333: regressions - FAIL

2019-06-24 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138333 xen-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138333/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 22 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 127792

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/4] x86/linker: add a reloc section to ELF binary

2019-06-24 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 12:34:13AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 19.06.19 at 17:06, wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 06:57:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 19.06.19 at 13:02, wrote: > >> > If the hypervisor has been built with EFI support (ie: multiboot2). > >> > This allows to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: Switch OMAP5 secondary cores into hyp mode

2019-06-24 Thread Julien Grall
(+ GSOC mentors and Andre) Hi Denis, Thank you for the patch. First of all, may I ask to CC the other mentors? On 6/21/19 9:02 PM, Denis Obrezkov wrote: This function allows xen to bring secondary CPU cores into non-secure HYP mode. This is done by using a Secure Monitor call.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen/ubsan: Don't perform alignment checking on supporting compilers

2019-06-24 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 24/06/2019 11:33, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 6/24/19 11:17 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> GCC 5 introduced -fsanitize=alignment which is enabled by default by >> CONFIG_UBSAN.  This trips a load of wont-fix cases in the ACPI tables >> and the >> hypercall page and stubs writing logic.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen/ubsan: Don't perform alignment checking on supporting compilers

2019-06-24 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Andrew, On 6/24/19 11:17 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: GCC 5 introduced -fsanitize=alignment which is enabled by default by CONFIG_UBSAN. This trips a load of wont-fix cases in the ACPI tables and the hypercall page and stubs writing logic. It also causes the native Xen boot to crash before the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] xen/arm: fix mask calculation in pdx_init_mask

2019-06-24 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Stefano, On 6/21/19 9:24 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: The mask calculation in pdx_init_mask is wrong when the first bank starts at address 0x0. The reason is that pdx_init_mask will do '0 - 1' causing an underflow. As a result, the mask becomes 0x which is the biggest

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen/ubsan: Don't perform alignment checking on supporting compilers

2019-06-24 Thread Andrew Cooper
GCC 5 introduced -fsanitize=alignment which is enabled by default by CONFIG_UBSAN. This trips a load of wont-fix cases in the ACPI tables and the hypercall page and stubs writing logic. It also causes the native Xen boot to crash before the console is set up, for an as-yet unidentified reason

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] xen/ubsan: Support for -fsanitise=builtin

2019-06-24 Thread Andrew Cooper
This fixes the UBSAN build for GCC 8 and later. The sanitiser checks for passing 0 to the ctz()/clz() builtins. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper --- CC: Jan Beulich CC: Wei Liu CC: Roger Pau Monné CC: Stefano Stabellini CC: Julien Grall --- xen/common/ubsan/ubsan.c | 21 +

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] xen/ubsan: Multiple fixes

2019-06-24 Thread Andrew Cooper
This series fixes building with GCC 8 and later, and fixes booting native with GCC 5 and later. Andrew Cooper (2): xen/ubsan: Don't perform alignment checking on supporting compilers xen/ubsan: Support for -fsanitise=builtin xen/Rules.mk | 4 +++- xen/common/ubsan/ubsan.c | 21

[Xen-devel] xl list wrong repot data

2019-06-24 Thread Radoslav Ivanov
Hello, I'm facing a problem with `xl list` output - as I'm fetching the output of this command once in a minute, gathering the sum of the last column to calculate CPUs/s usage I'm having a `data jumps` from 352242.2 to 9445321553.2 and then goes back to the previous value.  This `blurs` the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/linker: add a reloc section to ELF binary

2019-06-24 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 21.06.19 at 18:38, wrote: > if the hypervisor has been built with EFI support (ie: multiboot2). > This allows to position the .reloc section correctly in the output > binary. The title still says "add ... to ELF binary", when really such a section is already there (and in fact that's the

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 138307: regressions - FAIL

2019-06-24 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138307 xen-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138307/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-prev 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 133596

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 138327: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2019-06-24 Thread osstest service owner
flight 138327 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/138327/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 138190 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 13