From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
vPCI may map and unmap PCI device memory (BARs) being passed through which
may take a lot of time. For this those operations may be deferred to be
performed later, so that they can be safely preempted.
Currently this deferred processing is happening in common IOREQ
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
PCI host bridges are special devices in terms of implementing PCI
passthrough. According to [1] the current implementation depends on
Domain-0 to perform the initialization of the relevant PCI host
bridge hardware and perform PCI device enumeration. In order to
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
In order for vPCI to work it needs to maintain guest and hardware
domain's views of the configuration space. For example, BARs and
COMMAND registers require emulation for guests and the guest view
of the registers needs to be in sync with the real contents of the
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Arm's PCI passthrough implementation doesn't support legacy interrupts,
but MSI/MSI-X. This can be the case for other platforms too.
For that reason introduce a new CONFIG_PCI_SUPP_LEGACY_IRQ and add
it to the CFLAGS and compile the relevant code in the toolstack
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
The PCI device remove path may now be used by PVH on ARM, so the
assert is no longer valid.
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini
Reviewed-by: Rahul Singh
Tested-by: Rahul Singh
---
Cc: Ian Jackson
Cc: Juergen Gross
---
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
This is the very same that we already do for DT devices. Moreover, x86
already calls pci_release_devices().
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
Reviewed-by: Rahul Singh
Tested-by: Rahul Singh
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
While adding a PCI device mark it as such, so other frameworks
can distinguish it from DT devices.
For that introduce an architecture defined helper which may perform
additional initialization of the newly created PCI device.
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Make dt_find_node_by_phandle globally visible, so it can be re-used by
other frameworks.
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
Reviewed-by: Rahul Singh
Tested-by: Rahul Singh
---
xen/common/device_tree.c | 2 +-
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Get host bridge node given a PCI device attached to it.
This helper will be re-used for adding PCI devices by the subsequent
patches.
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
Reviewed-by: Rahul
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Add new device type (DEV_PCI) to distinguish PCI devices from platform
DT devices, so some drivers, like IOMMU, can handle PCI devices
differently.
Also add a helper which is when given a struct device returns the
corresponding struct pci_dev which this device is a
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Hi, all!
This is an assorted series of patches which aim is to make some further
basis for PCI passthrough on Arm support. The series continues the work
published earlier by Arm [1] and adds new helpers and clears the way for
vPCI changes which will follow.
RFC is
Add a section to the Argo design document to supply guidance on how to
enable Argo in Xen and where to obtain source code and documentation
for Argo device drivers for guest OSes, primarily from OpenXT.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Clark
---
docs/designs/argo.pandoc | 45
flight 165412 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/165412/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-armhf-libvirt
flight 165423 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/165423/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm
Hi Julien
So sorry for taking so long to respond. Just being back from the long National
Day holidays.
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 6:36 PM
> To: Penny Zheng ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
> sstabell...@kernel.org
> Cc: Bertrand
flight 165401 xen-4.13-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/165401/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 15 saverestore-support-check fail baseline
untested
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> translate_noncontig() allocates domheap page for translated list
> before calling to allocate_optee_shm_buf(), which can fail for number
> of reason. Anyways, after fail we need to free the allocated page(s).
>
> Another leak is possible if the same
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> >> Hi Stefano,
> >>
> >> Stefano Stabellini writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
> >> >> Hello all
> >> >>
> >> >> Gentle reminder.
> >> >
> >> > Many thanks for the ping, this
Hi Oleksandr, Stefano,
Oleksandr writes:
> On 07.10.21 01:42, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> Hi Stefano, Julien.
>
>> On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Stefano,
>>>
>>> On 28/09/2021 06:52, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> From:
translate_noncontig() allocates domheap page for translated list
before calling to allocate_optee_shm_buf(), which can fail for number
of reason. Anyways, after fail we need to free the allocated page(s).
Another leak is possible if the same translate_noncontig() function
fails to get domain
flight 165420 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/165420/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm
Hi,
Stefano Stabellini writes:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>> Stefano Stabellini writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
>> >> Hello all
>> >>
>> >> Gentle reminder.
>> >
>> > Many thanks for the ping, this patch fell off my radar.
>> >
flight 165394 linux-linus real [real]
flight 165421 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/165394/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/165421/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be
Hi Stefano,
> On 7 Oct 2021, at 8:54 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> I committed patches 2-7.
>
> I made two small adjustments on commit:
> - patch #3: bool_t/bool
> - patch #7: drop _XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci
Thank you very much. I will be on leave from tomorrow. Someone from my
team will take
On 07.10.21 23:42, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Stefano
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
On 07.10.21 23:06, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
On 07.10.21 04:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Stefano
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
From:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> Stefano Stabellini writes:
>
> > On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
> >> Hello all
> >>
> >> Gentle reminder.
> >
> > Many thanks for the ping, this patch fell off my radar.
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 23.09.21 23:57, Volodymyr
On 07.10.21 23:29, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Stefano
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
On 07.10.21 04:29, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Stefano
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
The extended region (safe range) is a region of guest
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
> On 07.10.21 23:06, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
> > > On 07.10.21 04:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Stefano
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> > > > > From: Oleksandr
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] libxl/arm: Add handling of
> extended regions for DomU"):
> > On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
> > > On 06.10.21 14:34, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > > Oleksandr Tyshchenko writes ("[PATCH V5 2/3] libxl/arm:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
> On 07.10.21 04:29, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> Hi Stefano
>
> > On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> > > From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
> > >
> > > The extended region (safe range) is a region of guest physical
> > > address space which is
On 07.10.21 23:06, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Stefano
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
On 07.10.21 04:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Stefano
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
This is a follow-up of
"b6fe410 xen/arm: Add handling of
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.10.2021 15:12, Oleksandr wrote:
> >
> > On 07.10.21 15:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jan.
> >
> >> On 07.10.2021 14:30, Oleksandr wrote:
> >>> On 07.10.21 10:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.10.2021 13:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> >
On 07.10.21 03:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Stefano
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
We need to pass info about maximum supported guest physical
address space size to the toolstack on Arm in order to properly
calculate the base and size of
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
> On 07.10.21 04:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> Hi Stefano
>
> > On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> > > From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
> > >
> > > This is a follow-up of
> > > "b6fe410 xen/arm: Add handling of extended regions for Dom0"
> > >
I committed patches 2-7.
I made two small adjustments on commit:
- patch #3: bool_t/bool
- patch #7: drop _XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci
Cheers,
Stefano
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Rahul Singh wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> The purpose of this patch series is to add PCI passthrough support to Xen on
> Arm. PCI
flight 165417 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/165417/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm
Hi Stefano,
Stefano Stabellini writes:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
>> Hello all
>>
>> Gentle reminder.
>
> Many thanks for the ping, this patch fell off my radar.
>
>
>
>> On 23.09.21 23:57, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
>> > Hi Stefano,
>> >
>> > Stefano Stabellini writes:
>> >
On 07.10.21 01:42, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Stefano, Julien.
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On 28/09/2021 06:52, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2021, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
Fix a possible copy-paste error in
On 07.10.21 04:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Stefano
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
This is a follow-up of
"b6fe410 xen/arm: Add handling of extended regions for Dom0"
Add various in-code comments, update Xen hypervisor device tree
bindings
On 07.10.21 04:29, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi Stefano
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
The extended region (safe range) is a region of guest physical
address space which is unused and could be safely used to create
grant/foreign mappings instead
flight 165398 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/165398/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf b4da6c29f1d36031e04212f53277ce0dcba309f1
baseline version:
ovmf
A general remark first: If I understand things correctly, a side effect
of this change is to also address the issue that I'm trying to take
care of in "x86/build: suppress EFI-related tool chain checks upon local
$(MAKE) recursion". However, while that one's a reasonable backporting
candidate, I
Rahul Singh writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
node in libxl"):
> As Stefano suggested in another email that we can remove the vpci
> option, if we reach to conclusion that we need vpci option I will
> move it to internal structure.
...
> Yes I agree with you VPCI
Hi Stefano,
> On 7 Oct 2021, at 1:26 am, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>>
>> On 06/10/2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>> diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl
>>> b/tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl
>>> index 3f9fff653a..78b1ddf0b8
Hi Ian,
> On 7 Oct 2021, at 11:53 am, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device
> tree node in libxl"):
>> On 06/10/2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>> diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl
>>> b/tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl
Hello Guys,
During some experiments in my PhD I've tried to reused a code from
Jann Horn (https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1184
) that used the mapping in
```
0x8040 - 0x807f [256GB, 2^38 bytes, PML4:256]
Reserved for future shared info with the
On 24.08.2021 12:50, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> --- a/.gitignore
> +++ b/.gitignore
> @@ -332,7 +332,6 @@ xen/include/compat/*
> xen/include/config/
> xen/include/generated/
> xen/include/public/public
> -xen/include/xen/*.new
While this indeed looks to only have been here for compile.h, I'm
not
On 07.10.21 13:57, Ian Jackson wrote:
Hi Ian.
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] libxl/arm: Add handling of extended
regions for DomU"):
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
On 06.10.21 14:34, Ian Jackson wrote:
Oleksandr Tyshchenko writes ("[PATCH V5 2/3] libxl/arm: Add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Xen Security Advisory CVE-2021-28702 / XSA-386
version 2
PCI devices with RMRRs not deassigned correctly
UPDATES IN VERSION 2
Updated/corrected information about
flight 165392 linux-5.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/165392/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit1 14 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 165206
Tests which are
> On 6 Oct 2021, at 19:32, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Luca,
>
> Sorry for jumping late in the conversation. While skimming through what has
> been committed, I noticed one potential issue in this patch and have also a
> question.
>
> On 30/09/2021 16:28, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> Introduce
On 24.08.2021 12:50, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> This avoid the need to create the symbolic link "include/asm".
>
> Whenever a comment refer to an "asm" headers, this patch avoid
> spelling the arch when not needed to avoid some code churn.
>
> One unrelated change is to sort entries in MAINTAINERS
flight 165395 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/165395/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-armhf-libvirt
On 24.08.2021 12:50, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> This will allow to detect command line changes and allow to regenerate
> the file in that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
Acked-by: Jan Beulich
On 07.10.2021 15:12, Oleksandr wrote:
>
> On 07.10.21 15:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> Hi Jan.
>
>> On 07.10.2021 14:30, Oleksandr wrote:
>>> On 07.10.21 10:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.10.2021 13:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> Changes V4 -> V5:
> - update patch subject and
On 06.10.2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
> +/*
> + * xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + *
Hi Ian
> On 7 Oct 2021, at 11:50 am, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> Rahul Singh writes ("Re: [PATCH v4 13/14] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
> node in libxl"):
>> On 6 Oct 2021, at 12:33 pm, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> We try
>>> to make the libxl API "do the right thing" by default. In this case I
On 07.10.21 15:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hi Jan.
On 07.10.2021 14:30, Oleksandr wrote:
On 07.10.21 10:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.10.2021 13:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
Changes V4 -> V5:
- update patch subject and description
- drop Michal's R-b
- pass gpaddr_bits via
On 06.10.2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> @@ -70,9 +70,11 @@ struct xen_domctl_createdomain {
> #define XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_iommu (1U<<_XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_iommu)
> #define _XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_nested_virt 6
> #define
On 06.10.2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
> Add cmdline boot option "pci-passthrough = = " to enable or
> disable the PCI passthrough support on ARM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
> Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis
Acked-by: Jan Beulich
On 07.10.2021 02:05, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> Hardware domain is in charge of doing the PCI enumeration and will
>> discover the PCI devices and then will communicate to XEN via hyper
>> call PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add(..) to add the PCI devices in XEN.
On 07.10.2021 14:30, Oleksandr wrote:
> On 07.10.21 10:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.10.2021 13:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>>> Changes V4 -> V5:
>>> - update patch subject and description
>>> - drop Michal's R-b
>>> - pass gpaddr_bits via createdomain domctl
>>> (struct
On 07.10.21 10:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hi Jan.
On 06.10.2021 13:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
Changes V4 -> V5:
- update patch subject and description
- drop Michal's R-b
- pass gpaddr_bits via createdomain domctl
(struct xen_arch_domainconfig)
I'm afraid I can't bring
flight 165390 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/165390/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-raw 17 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 164950
Tests which are
Hi Oleksandr,
>> From: Roman Skakun
>>
>> Xen is not exposing any IOMMU properties to Dom0.
>> So Dom0 assumes that all it's devices are not protected by IOMMU.
>>
>> To make Dom0 aware of IOMMU-protected devices, we need to mark
>> them somehow. With this approach Dom0 Linux kernel will be able
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] libxl/arm: Add handling of
extended regions for DomU"):
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Oleksandr wrote:
> > On 06.10.21 14:34, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Oleksandr Tyshchenko writes ("[PATCH V5 2/3] libxl/arm: Add handling of
> > > extended regions for DomU"):
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
node in libxl"):
> On 06/10/2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl
> > b/tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl
> > index 3f9fff653a..78b1ddf0b8 100644
> > ---
Rahul Singh writes ("Re: [PATCH v4 13/14] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree
node in libxl"):
> On 6 Oct 2021, at 12:33 pm, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > We try
> > to make the libxl API "do the right thing" by default. In this case I
> > think that means to enable VPCI (i) on platforms where it's
Hi Julien,
> On 6 Oct 2021, at 6:53 pm, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Rahul,
>
> On 06/10/2021 19:34, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>> On 6 Oct 2021, at 12:33 pm, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>>
>>> Rahul Singh writes ("Re: [PATCH v4 13/14] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device
>>> tree node in libxl"):
Hi Ian
On 05.10.2021 13:11, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Branch Harden is enabled by default at compile and boot time. Invert the code
> to compile with lfence by default and nop out in the non-default case.
>
> This has several advantages. It removes 3829 patch points (in the random
> build of Xen I have
On 07.10.2021 10:21, Michal Orzel wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 07.10.2021 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>>> @@ -692,6 +692,12 @@ int arch_sanitise_domain_config(struct
>>> xen_domctl_createdomain
Hi Jan,
> On 7 Oct 2021, at 9:27 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 06.10.2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> @@ -62,8 +63,19 @@ static int __init acpi_pci_init(void)
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> +/* By default pci passthrough is disabled. */
>> +bool __read_mostly pci_passthrough_enabled;
>
> You properly
On 06.10.2021 19:40, Rahul Singh wrote:
> @@ -62,8 +63,19 @@ static int __init acpi_pci_init(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> +/* By default pci passthrough is disabled. */
> +bool __read_mostly pci_passthrough_enabled;
You properly use "bool " here. Why ...
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/pci.h
> +++
Hi Jan,
On 07.10.2021 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> @@ -692,6 +692,12 @@ int arch_sanitise_domain_config(struct
>> xen_domctl_createdomain *config)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
flight 165388 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/165388/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 165371
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16
On 07.10.2021 10:02, Michal Orzel wrote:
> On 07.10.2021 09:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote:
>>> Introduce flag XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu which
>>> indicates whether the platform supports vPMU
>>> functionality. Modify Xen and tools accordingly.
>>>
>>> Take the
On 06.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -692,6 +692,12 @@ int arch_sanitise_domain_config(struct
> xen_domctl_createdomain *config)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +if ( config->flags & XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpmu )
> +{
Hi,
On 07.10.2021 09:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> Introduce flag XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu which
>> indicates whether the platform supports vPMU
>> functionality. Modify Xen and tools accordingly.
>>
>> Take the opportunity and fix XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vmtrace
On 06.10.2021 12:58, Michal Orzel wrote:
> Introduce flag XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vpmu which
> indicates whether the platform supports vPMU
> functionality. Modify Xen and tools accordingly.
>
> Take the opportunity and fix XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_vmtrace
> definition in sysctl.h which wrongly uses (1<<6)
On 06.10.2021 13:22, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> Changes V4 -> V5:
>- update patch subject and description
>- drop Michal's R-b
>- pass gpaddr_bits via createdomain domctl
> (struct xen_arch_domainconfig)
I'm afraid I can't bring this in line with ...
> ---
On 04.10.2021 07:58, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>
>
> On 01.10.21 16:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 30.09.2021 09:52, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> @@ -445,14 +456,25 @@ static void rom_write(const struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>> unsigned int reg,
>>> rom->addr = val &
On 02.10.2021 04:35, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 09:08:34AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 29.09.2021 17:31, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>>>
>>> Copy and paste from the xl.cfg man page:
>>>
>>>nestedhvm=BOOLEAN
>>>Enable or disables guest access to hardware
On 01.10.2021 17:13, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>
>
>> On 1 Oct 2021, at 15:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 01.10.2021 15:55, Luca Fancellu wrote:
On 1 Oct 2021, at 12:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.09.2021 16:28, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> @@ -1361,12 +1361,30 @@ efi_start(EFI_HANDLE
83 matches
Mail list logo
