On 06/13/2018 01:07 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:48:56AM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
+ if (!(with_kbd | with_ptr | with_mtouch)) {
I changed this to logical "OR" and applied, thank you.
Yes, that's better, thank you
+ ret = -ENXIO;
+
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:48:56AM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>
> + if (!(with_kbd | with_ptr | with_mtouch)) {
I changed this to logical "OR" and applied, thank you.
> + ret = -ENXIO;
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> ret =
On 12/06/18 09:48, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>
> It is now only possible to control if multi-touch virtual device
> is created or not (via the corresponding XenStore entries),
> but keyboard and pointer devices are always created.
> In some cases this is not
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
It is now only possible to control if multi-touch virtual device
is created or not (via the corresponding XenStore entries),
but keyboard and pointer devices are always created.
In some cases this is not desirable. For example, if virtual
keyboard device is exposed
