Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/7] x86/alt: Drop unused alternative infrastructure

2018-02-13 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 13/02/18 14:22, Jan Beulich wrote: On 12.02.18 at 12:23, wrote: >> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/alternative.h >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/alternative.h >> @@ -65,11 +65,6 @@ extern void alternative_instructions(void); >> ALTERNATIVE(oldinstr, newinstr1,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/7] x86/alt: Drop unused alternative infrastructure

2018-02-13 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 12.02.18 at 12:23, wrote: > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/alternative.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/alternative.h > @@ -65,11 +65,6 @@ extern void alternative_instructions(void); > ALTERNATIVE(oldinstr, newinstr1, feature1)\ >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/7] x86/alt: Drop unused alternative infrastructure

2018-02-12 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 12/02/18 15:56, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:23:01AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> ALTERNATIVE_3 is more complicated than ALTERNATIVE_2 when it comes to >> calculating extra padding length, and we have no need for the complexity. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/7] x86/alt: Drop unused alternative infrastructure

2018-02-12 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:23:01AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > ALTERNATIVE_3 is more complicated than ALTERNATIVE_2 when it comes to > calculating extra padding length, and we have no need for the complexity. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Roger Pau

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/7] x86/alt: Drop unused alternative infrastructure

2018-02-12 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:23:01AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > ALTERNATIVE_3 is more complicated than ALTERNATIVE_2 when it comes to > calculating extra padding length, and we have no need for the complexity. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper Reviewed-by: Wei Liu