On 8/17/19 1:48 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
I think you are right, and honestly I was thinking about it while I
updated this patch. If I use -EINVAL, it would be the same return error
as the "invalid #address-cells or #size-cells". I just wanted to
dou
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16/08/2019 00:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Change the signature of process_memory_node to match
> > device_tree_node_func. Thanks to this change, the next patch will be
> > able to use device_tree_for_each_node to call process_memory_node
Hi,
On 16/08/2019 00:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Change the signature of process_memory_node to match
device_tree_node_func. Thanks to this change, the next patch will be
able to use device_tree_for_each_node to call process_memory_node on all
the children of a provided node.
Return error if
