Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/{c,o}xenstored: Don't link against libsystemd

2024-05-01 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 01/05/2024 2:29 pm, Anthony PERARD wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 09:51:47AM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote: >> Run `systemd-notify --ready` instead. Hopefully, that will be enough. >> ($NOTIFY_SOCKET is a socket, and a bit more complicated that I though, >> it can start with "@" for example) >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/{c,o}xenstored: Don't link against libsystemd

2024-05-01 Thread Anthony PERARD
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 09:51:47AM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote: > Run `systemd-notify --ready` instead. Hopefully, that will be enough. > ($NOTIFY_SOCKET is a socket, and a bit more complicated that I though, > it can start with "@" for example) FTR: If it turns out that calling systemd-notify

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/{c,o}xenstored: Don't link against libsystemd

2024-04-29 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 25.04.24 19:32, Andrew Cooper wrote: libsystemd is a giant dependency for one single function, but in the wake of the xz backdoor, it turns out that even systemd leadership recommend against linking against libsystemd for sd_notify(). Since commit 7b61011e1450 ("tools: make xenstore domain

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/{c,o}xenstored: Don't link against libsystemd

2024-04-26 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 26/04/2024 9:51 am, Anthony PERARD wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 07:16:23PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 25/04/2024 7:06 pm, Anthony PERARD wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 06:32:15PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: libsystemd is a giant dependency for one single function, but in the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/{c,o}xenstored: Don't link against libsystemd

2024-04-26 Thread Anthony PERARD
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 07:16:23PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 25/04/2024 7:06 pm, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 06:32:15PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > >> libsystemd is a giant dependency for one single function, but in the wake > >> of > >> the xz backdoor, it turns

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/{c,o}xenstored: Don't link against libsystemd

2024-04-25 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 25/04/2024 7:06 pm, Anthony PERARD wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 06:32:15PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> libsystemd is a giant dependency for one single function, but in the wake of >> the xz backdoor, it turns out that even systemd leadership recommend against >> linking against

Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/{c,o}xenstored: Don't link against libsystemd

2024-04-25 Thread Anthony PERARD
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 06:32:15PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > libsystemd is a giant dependency for one single function, but in the wake of > the xz backdoor, it turns out that even systemd leadership recommend against > linking against libsystemd for sd_notify(). > > Since commit 7b61011e1450

[PATCH 1/2] tools/{c,o}xenstored: Don't link against libsystemd

2024-04-25 Thread Andrew Cooper
libsystemd is a giant dependency for one single function, but in the wake of the xz backdoor, it turns out that even systemd leadership recommend against linking against libsystemd for sd_notify(). Since commit 7b61011e1450 ("tools: make xenstore domain easy configurable") in Xen 4.8, the