Re: [PATCH v2] 9p/xen: increase XEN_9PFS_RING_ORDER

2020-06-02 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Stefano Stabellini wrote on Mon, Jun 01, 2020: > > > LGTM, I'll try to find some time to test this by the end of next week or > > > will trust you if I can't make it -- ping me around June 1st if I don't > > > reply again until then... > > > > Ping

Re: [PATCH v2] 9p/xen: increase XEN_9PFS_RING_ORDER

2020-06-02 Thread Dominique Martinet
Stefano Stabellini wrote on Mon, Jun 01, 2020: > > LGTM, I'll try to find some time to test this by the end of next week or > > will trust you if I can't make it -- ping me around June 1st if I don't > > reply again until then... > > Ping :-) I actually did think about this patch this weekend! .

Re: [PATCH v2] 9p/xen: increase XEN_9PFS_RING_ORDER

2020-06-01 Thread Stefano Stabellini
n Fri, 22 May 2020, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Stefano Stabellini wrote on Thu, May 21, 2020: > > From: Stefano Stabellini > > > > Increase XEN_9PFS_RING_ORDER to 9 for performance reason. Order 9 is the > > max allowed by the protocol. > > > > We can't assume that all backends will support

Re: [PATCH v2] 9p/xen: increase XEN_9PFS_RING_ORDER

2020-05-22 Thread Dominique Martinet
Stefano Stabellini wrote on Thu, May 21, 2020: > From: Stefano Stabellini > > Increase XEN_9PFS_RING_ORDER to 9 for performance reason. Order 9 is the > max allowed by the protocol. > > We can't assume that all backends will support order 9. The xenstore > property max-ring-page-order specifies

[PATCH v2] 9p/xen: increase XEN_9PFS_RING_ORDER

2020-05-21 Thread Stefano Stabellini
From: Stefano Stabellini Increase XEN_9PFS_RING_ORDER to 9 for performance reason. Order 9 is the max allowed by the protocol. We can't assume that all backends will support order 9. The xenstore property max-ring-page-order specifies the max order supported by the backend. We'll use