On 26.04.2024 14:09, Oleksii wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-04-26 at 12:51 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 26.04.2024 10:21, Oleksii wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 17:44 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.04.2024 12:04, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> Return type was left 'int' because of the following
On Fri, 2024-04-26 at 12:51 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 26.04.2024 10:21, Oleksii wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 17:44 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > On 17.04.2024 12:04, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> > > > Return type was left 'int' because of the following compilation
> > > > error:
> > > >
>
On 26.04.2024 10:21, Oleksii wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 17:44 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.04.2024 12:04, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
>>> Return type was left 'int' because of the following compilation
>>> error:
>>>
>>> ./include/xen/kernel.h:18:21: error: comparison of distinct pointer
>>>
On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 17:44 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.04.2024 12:04, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> > Return type was left 'int' because of the following compilation
> > error:
> >
> > ./include/xen/kernel.h:18:21: error: comparison of distinct pointer
> > types lacks a cast [-Werror]
> >
On 17.04.2024 12:04, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> Return type was left 'int' because of the following compilation error:
>
> ./include/xen/kernel.h:18:21: error: comparison of distinct pointer types
> lacks a cast [-Werror]
>18 | (void) (&_x == &_y);\
> |
Return type was left 'int' because of the following compilation error:
./include/xen/kernel.h:18:21: error: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks
a cast [-Werror]
18 | (void) (&_x == &_y);\
| ^~
common/page_alloc.c:1843:34: note:
