> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 12:29 AM
>
> Perhaps there once was a plan to have a flush type requiring this, but
> the current SDM has no mention of such and all callers pass zero anyway.
>
> Take the opportunity and also change involved types
On 06/12/17 16:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Perhaps there once was a plan to have a flush type requiring this, but
> the current SDM has no mention of such and all callers pass zero anyway.
>
> Take the opportunity and also change involved types to uint64_t.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
