Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arm: Coverity 1469342 correct find_*_bit() functions use

On 24/05/18 15:07, Artem Mygaiev wrote: Hi Julien Hi Artem, On 24.05.18 16:49, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Artem, Thank you for the report. On 24/05/18 14:20, Artem Mygaiev wrote: vgic_vcpu_pending_irq() uses find_next_bit() library function with single 'unsigned long' variable, while it

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arm: Coverity 1469342 correct find_*_bit() functions use

Hi Julien On 24.05.18 16:49, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Artem, Thank you for the report. On 24/05/18 14:20, Artem Mygaiev wrote: vgic_vcpu_pending_irq() uses find_next_bit() library function with single 'unsigned long' variable, while it is designed to work with memory regions. Nothing wrong is

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arm: Coverity 1469342 correct find_*_bit() functions use

Hi Artem, Thank you for the report. On 24/05/18 14:20, Artem Mygaiev wrote: vgic_vcpu_pending_irq() uses find_next_bit() library function with single 'unsigned long' variable, while it is designed to work with memory regions. Nothing wrong is happening since 'offset' is set to 0 (other