Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/boot: Further minor GDT corrections

2019-08-27 Thread Jan Beulich
On 19.08.2019 15:42, Andrew Cooper wrote: gdt_boot_descr and gdt_48 disagree on how long trampoline_gdt is. Introduce an end label and have the linker calculate the size, rather than hard coding it. Also, just as with c/s af292b41e9, there is no point forcing the CPU to set Access bits. Fix

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/boot: Further minor GDT corrections

2019-08-19 Thread Andrew Cooper
gdt_boot_descr and gdt_48 disagree on how long trampoline_gdt is. Introduce an end label and have the linker calculate the size, rather than hard coding it. Also, just as with c/s af292b41e9, there is no point forcing the CPU to set Access bits. Fix all remaining GDTs in Xen. Signed-off-by: