On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 06:57:06PM -0700, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:33 AM Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> >
> > The current usage of need_iommu_pt_sync in p2m for non-translated
> > guests is wrong because it doesn't correctly handle a relaxed PV
> > hardware domain, that has
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:33 AM Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>
> The current usage of need_iommu_pt_sync in p2m for non-translated
> guests is wrong because it doesn't correctly handle a relaxed PV
> hardware domain, that has need_sync set to false, but still need
> entries to be added from calls to
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:32:41AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 22.07.2019 17:32, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > The current usage of need_iommu_pt_sync in p2m for non-translated
> > guests is wrong because it doesn't correctly handle a relaxed PV
> > hardware domain, that has need_sync set to
On 22.07.2019 17:32, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> The current usage of need_iommu_pt_sync in p2m for non-translated
> guests is wrong because it doesn't correctly handle a relaxed PV
> hardware domain, that has need_sync set to false, but still need
> entries to be added from calls to
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Pau Monne
> Sent: 22 July 2019 16:32
> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Roger Pau Monne ; George Dunlap
> ; Jan Beulich
> ; Andrew Cooper ; Wei Liu
> ; Paul Durrant
>
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/p2m: fix non-translated handling of iommu mappings
>
The current usage of need_iommu_pt_sync in p2m for non-translated
guests is wrong because it doesn't correctly handle a relaxed PV
hardware domain, that has need_sync set to false, but still need
entries to be added from calls to {set/clear}_identity_p2m_entry.
Adjust the code in
