On 06/12/2018 03:35 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>>> @@ -210,7 +211,7 @@ static int p2m_init_altp2m(struct domain *d)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>> }
>>> p2m->p2m_class = p2m_alternate;
>>> -p2m->access_required = 1;
>>> +p2m->access_required = hostp2m->access
>>> On 12.06.18 at 14:35, wrote:
> On 06/12/2018 03:23 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.06.18 at 17:12, wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/domctl.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/domctl.c
>>> @@ -1094,6 +1094,8 @@ long do_domctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t)
>>> u_domctl)
>>> domain_pause(d
Thanks for the review!
On 06/12/2018 03:23 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.06.18 at 17:12, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>> #include
>> #include
>> #include
>> +#include
>
> Not the least to avoid this I think ...
>
>> @@ -719
>>> On 11.06.18 at 17:12, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> +#include
Not the least to avoid this I think ...
> @@ -719,6 +720,22 @@ int arch_domain_soft_reset(struct domain *d)
> return ret;
> }
For the hostp2m, access_required starts off as 0, then it can be
set with xc_domain_set_access_required(). However, all the altp2ms
set it to 1 on init, and ignore both the hostp2m and the hypercall.
This patch sets access_required to the value from the hostp2m
on altp2m init, and propagates the va
