Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/public: arch-arm: Use xen_mk_ullong instead of suffixing value with ULL

2019-07-29 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: > Looks good to me > > > There are a few places in include/public/arch-arm.h that are still > > suffixing immediate with ULL instead of using xen_mk_ullong. > > > > The latter allows a consumer to easily tweak the header if ULL is not > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/public: arch-arm: Use xen_mk_ullong instead of suffixing value with ULL

2019-06-26 Thread Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
Looks good to me > There are a few places in include/public/arch-arm.h that are still > suffixing immediate with ULL instead of using xen_mk_ullong. > > The latter allows a consumer to easily tweak the header if ULL is not > supported. > > So switch the remaining users of ULL to xen_mk_ullong.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/public: arch-arm: Use xen_mk_ullong instead of suffixing value with ULL

2019-06-26 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, Gentle ping. Cheers, On 03/06/2019 17:08, Julien Grall wrote: There are a few places in include/public/arch-arm.h that are still suffixing immediate with ULL instead of using xen_mk_ullong. The latter allows a consumer to easily tweak the header if ULL is not supported. So switch the

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/public: arch-arm: Use xen_mk_ullong instead of suffixing value with ULL

2019-06-03 Thread Julien Grall
There are a few places in include/public/arch-arm.h that are still suffixing immediate with ULL instead of using xen_mk_ullong. The latter allows a consumer to easily tweak the header if ULL is not supported. So switch the remaining users of ULL to xen_mk_ullong. Signed-off-by: Julien Grall