>>> On 11.07.18 at 15:15, wrote:
> While indirect calls have always been more expensive than direct ones,
> their cost has further increased with the Spectre v2 mitigations. In a
> number of cases we simply pointlessly use them in the first place. In
> many other cases the indirection solely
>>> On 13.07.18 at 19:15, wrote:
> On 13/07/18 15:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.07.18 at 15:39, wrote:
>>> On 13/07/18 14:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 13.07.18 at 15:00, wrote:
> What would be the generic interface here? I saw it was based on
> alternative for the plumbing.
Hi,
On 13/07/18 14:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.07.18 at 15:00, wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 13/07/18 09:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.07.18 at 15:15, wrote:
While indirect calls have always been more expensive than direct ones,
their cost has further increased with the Spectre v2 mitigations. In a
>>> On 13.07.18 at 15:00, wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 13/07/18 09:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.07.18 at 15:15, wrote:
>>> While indirect calls have always been more expensive than direct ones,
>>> their cost has further increased with the Spectre v2 mitigations. In a
>>> number of cases we
Hi Jan,
On 13/07/18 09:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.07.18 at 15:15, wrote:
While indirect calls have always been more expensive than direct ones,
their cost has further increased with the Spectre v2 mitigations. In a
number of cases we simply pointlessly use them in the first place. In
many
>>> On 11.07.18 at 15:15, wrote:
> While indirect calls have always been more expensive than direct ones,
> their cost has further increased with the Spectre v2 mitigations. In a
> number of cases we simply pointlessly use them in the first place. In
> many other cases the indirection solely
While indirect calls have always been more expensive than direct ones,
their cost has further increased with the Spectre v2 mitigations. In a
number of cases we simply pointlessly use them in the first place. In
many other cases the indirection solely exists to abstract from e.g.
vendor specific