On 13/03/2018 10:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.03.18 at 10:48, wrote:
>> On 13/03/18 10:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.03.18 at 10:27, wrote:
On 13/03/18 09:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.03.18 at 14:10, wrote:
>> BTW:
>>> On 13.03.18 at 10:48, wrote:
> On 13/03/18 10:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.03.18 at 10:27, wrote:
>>> On 13/03/18 09:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 12.03.18 at 14:10, wrote:
> BTW: are you already working on rebasing your XPTI
On 13/03/18 10:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.03.18 at 10:27, wrote:
>> On 13/03/18 09:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.03.18 at 14:10, wrote:
BTW: are you already working on rebasing your XPTI speed up series to
current staging? I'd like my
>>> On 13.03.18 at 10:27, wrote:
> On 13/03/18 09:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.03.18 at 14:10, wrote:
>>> BTW: are you already working on rebasing your XPTI speed up series to
>>> current staging? I'd like my series to use your series as a base unless
>>>
On 13/03/18 09:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.03.18 at 14:10, wrote:
>> BTW: are you already working on rebasing your XPTI speed up series to
>> current staging? I'd like my series to use your series as a base unless
>> you are telling me you won't be able to resend your
>>> On 12.03.18 at 14:10, wrote:
> BTW: are you already working on rebasing your XPTI speed up series to
> current staging? I'd like my series to use your series as a base unless
> you are telling me you won't be able to resend your series soon.
Coming back to my reply here
On 12/03/18 14:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
Juergen Gross 03/12/18 2:10 PM >>>
>> BTW: are you already working on rebasing your XPTI speed up series to
>> current staging? I'd like my series to use your series as a base unless
>> you are telling me you won't be able to resend your
>>> Juergen Gross 03/12/18 2:10 PM >>>
>BTW: are you already working on rebasing your XPTI speed up series to
>current staging? I'd like my series to use your series as a base unless
>you are telling me you won't be able to resend your series soon.
I hope to be able to get to
On 12/03/18 13:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
Juergen Gross 03/09/18 7:05 PM >>>
>> On 09/03/18 16:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.03.18 at 10:50, wrote:
@@ -120,11 +121,24 @@ unsigned int flush_area_local(const void *va,
unsigned int flags)
>>> Juergen Gross 03/09/18 7:05 PM >>>
>On 09/03/18 16:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.03.18 at 10:50, wrote:
>>> @@ -120,11 +121,24 @@ unsigned int flush_area_local(const void *va,
>>> unsigned int flags)
>>> else
>>> {
>>>
On 09/03/18 16:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.03.18 at 10:50, wrote:
>> @@ -120,11 +121,24 @@ unsigned int flush_area_local(const void *va, unsigned
>> int flags)
>> else
>> {
>> u32 t = pre_flush();
>> -unsigned long cr4 =
>>> On 05.03.18 at 10:50, wrote:
> @@ -120,11 +121,24 @@ unsigned int flush_area_local(const void *va, unsigned
> int flags)
> else
> {
> u32 t = pre_flush();
> -unsigned long cr4 = read_cr4();
>
> -write_cr4(cr4 &
>>> On 05.03.18 at 14:31, wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:24:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 05.03.18 at 14:11, wrote:
>> > On 05/03/18 13:57, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> >> When we start using PCID for user mappings, then we don't need them to
>>
On 05/03/18 13:31, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:24:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.03.18 at 14:11, wrote:
>>> On 05/03/18 13:57, Andrew Cooper wrote:
When we start using PCID for user mappings, then we don't need them to
be global, at which
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:24:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 05.03.18 at 14:11, wrote:
> > On 05/03/18 13:57, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> When we start using PCID for user mappings, then we don't need them to
> >> be global, at which point we can require/expect that the
>>> On 05.03.18 at 14:11, wrote:
> On 05/03/18 13:57, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> When we start using PCID for user mappings, then we don't need them to
>> be global, at which point we can require/expect that the only global
>> mappings are hypervisor ones which we expect to remain
On 05/03/18 13:57, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/03/18 12:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.03.18 at 13:35, wrote:
>>> On 05/03/18 12:06, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 05/03/18 12:50, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/03/18 11:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.03.18
On 05/03/18 12:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.03.18 at 13:35, wrote:
>> On 05/03/18 12:06, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 05/03/18 12:50, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 05/03/18 11:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.03.18 at 10:50, wrote:
>>
>>> On 05.03.18 at 13:35, wrote:
> On 05/03/18 12:06, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 05/03/18 12:50, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 05/03/18 11:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.03.18 at 10:50, wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
On 05/03/18 12:06, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 05/03/18 12:50, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 05/03/18 11:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.03.18 at 10:50, wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
>>> No description at all? I'd at least expect mention of how much
On 05/03/18 12:50, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/03/18 11:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.03.18 at 10:50, wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
>> No description at all? I'd at least expect mention of how much of a
>> performance win this is (for whichever
On 05/03/18 11:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.03.18 at 10:50, wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
> No description at all? I'd at least expect mention of how much of a
> performance win this is (for whichever hardware you happen to
> know that).
>
>> @@
>>> On 05.03.18 at 10:50, wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
No description at all? I'd at least expect mention of how much of a
performance win this is (for whichever hardware you happen to
know that).
> @@ -120,11 +121,24 @@ unsigned int
On 05/03/18 10:50, Wei Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross
Juergen
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
24 matches
Mail list logo