Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/17] tools/libxl: Remove libxl_cpuid_{set, apply_policy}() from the API

2020-02-24 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 27/01/2020 14:34, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> These functions should never have been exposed.  They don't have external
> users, and can't usefully be used for several reasons.
>
> Move libxl_cpuid_{set,apply_policy}() to being internal functions, and leave
> an equivalent of the nop stubs in the API for caller compatibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper 

This has already been committed (c/s
dacb80f9757c011161cec6609f39837c9ea8caa8) as part of a smaller series
developed subsequent to posting this series, which made sense to go in
ahead.

~Andrew

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/17] tools/libxl: Remove libxl_cpuid_{set, apply_policy}() from the API

2020-01-27 Thread Andrew Cooper
These functions should never have been exposed.  They don't have external
users, and can't usefully be used for several reasons.

Move libxl_cpuid_{set,apply_policy}() to being internal functions, and leave
an equivalent of the nop stubs in the API for caller compatibility.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper 
---
CC: Ian Jackson 
CC: Wei Liu 
CC: Anthony PERARD 

RFC for obvious reasons.  An alternative would be to #if 0 them, which would
result in a compile failure rather than silent stubbing.  I'm not sure which
is least bad, but I don't think either are going to cause a problem in
practice.
---
 tools/libxl/libxl.h  | 26 ++
 tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c|  6 +++---
 tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c  |  4 ++--
 tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h |  4 
 tools/libxl/libxl_nocpuid.c  |  6 +++---
 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.h b/tools/libxl/libxl.h
index 54abb9db1f..a02548f595 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl.h
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.h
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ typedef struct libxl__ctx libxl_ctx;
 #if LIBXL_API_VERSION != 0x040200 && LIBXL_API_VERSION != 0x040300 && \
 LIBXL_API_VERSION != 0x040400 && LIBXL_API_VERSION != 0x040500 && \
 LIBXL_API_VERSION != 0x040700 && LIBXL_API_VERSION != 0x040800 && \
-LIBXL_API_VERSION != 0x041300
+LIBXL_API_VERSION != 0x041300 && LIBXL_API_VERSION != 0x041400
 #error Unknown LIBXL_API_VERSION
 #endif
 #endif
@@ -2323,9 +2323,27 @@ libxl_device_pci 
*libxl_device_pci_assignable_list(libxl_ctx *ctx, int *num);
 int libxl_cpuid_parse_config(libxl_cpuid_policy_list *cpuid, const char* str);
 int libxl_cpuid_parse_config_xend(libxl_cpuid_policy_list *cpuid,
   const char* str);
-void libxl_cpuid_apply_policy(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid);
-void libxl_cpuid_set(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid,
- libxl_cpuid_policy_list cpuid);
+#if LIBXL_API_VERSION < 0x041400
+/*
+ * Dropped from the API in Xen 4.14.  At the time of writing, these functions
+ * don't appear to ever have had external callers.
+ *
+ * These have always been used internally during domain construction, and
+ * can't easily be used externally because of their implicit parameters in
+ * other pieces of global state.
+ *
+ * Furthermore, an API user can't usefully determine whether they get
+ * libxl_cpuid (the real implementation) or libxl_nocpuid (no-op stubs).
+ *
+ * The internal behaviour of these functions also needs to change.  Therefore
+ * for simplicitly, provide the no-op stubs.  Yes technically this is an API
+ * change in some cases for existing software, but there is 0 of that in
+ * practice.
+ */
+static inline void libxl_cpuid_apply_policy(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid) {}
+static inline void libxl_cpuid_set(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid,
+   libxl_cpuid_policy_list cpuid) {}
+#endif
 
 /*
  * Functions for allowing users of libxl to store private data
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
index 5c52cbe0f9..505ec1b048 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
@@ -410,13 +410,13 @@ int libxl_cpuid_parse_config_xend(libxl_cpuid_policy_list 
*cpuid,
 return 0;
 }
 
-void libxl_cpuid_apply_policy(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid)
+void libxl__cpuid_apply_policy(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid)
 {
 xc_cpuid_apply_policy(ctx->xch, domid, NULL, 0);
 }
 
-void libxl_cpuid_set(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid,
- libxl_cpuid_policy_list cpuid)
+void libxl__cpuid_set(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid,
+  libxl_cpuid_policy_list cpuid)
 {
 int i;
 char *cpuid_res[4];
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
index 573c63692b..b730365f47 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
@@ -454,9 +454,9 @@ int libxl__build_post(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
 if (rc)
 return rc;
 
-libxl_cpuid_apply_policy(ctx, domid);
+libxl__cpuid_apply_policy(ctx, domid);
 if (info->cpuid != NULL)
-libxl_cpuid_set(ctx, domid, info->cpuid);
+libxl__cpuid_set(ctx, domid, info->cpuid);
 
 if (info->type == LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_HVM
 && !libxl_ms_vm_genid_is_zero(>u.hvm.ms_vm_genid)) {
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h b/tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h
index 64f6fdada8..50856ca703 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h
@@ -2042,6 +2042,10 @@ struct libxl__cpuid_policy {
 char *policy[4];
 };
 
+_hidden void libxl__cpuid_apply_policy(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid);
+_hidden void libxl__cpuid_set(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid,
+  libxl_cpuid_policy_list cpuid);
+
 /* Calls poll() again - useful to check whether a signaled condition
  * is still true.  Cannot fail.  Returns currently-true revents. */
 _hidden short libxl__fd_poll_recheck(libxl__egc *egc, int fd, short events);
diff --git