Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/15] xen/arm: vpsci: Add support for PSCI 1.1

[Julien Grall]

On 14/02/18 19:14, Mirela Simonovic wrote:

Hi Julien,


Hi,


On 02/13/2018 12:44 AM, Julien Grall wrote:



On 12/02/2018 23:16, Mirela Simonovic wrote:

Hi Julien,


Hi,


On 02/12/2018 10:41 PM, Julien Grall wrote:



On 12/02/2018 20:12, Mirela Simonovic wrote:

Hi Julien,


Hi Mirela,

Thank you for the review.

I've done pretty much the same work in parallel, but there are few 
additional minor changes I've made. Briefly, the difference is in 
return values that some already implemented functions should return 
starting from v1.0 (and even v0.2 errata). Please let me know 
whether you omitted that intentionally.


Could you give a bit more details here? From a brief look we don't 
seem to implement correctly:
- CPU_OFF: PSCI_DENY should be return on failure (though it 
should never fail in Xen case) and the check on the vCPU state is 
pointless.


I believe CPU_OFF is fine today, it never returns.

- MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE: should technically return int32_t instead 
of uint32_t. That not really matter for now.


If you speak about denying SMC64 call from AArch32, then this is 
already done in vsmccc.c (see vsmccc_call).


Agreed on above, there are 2 more:

1. MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE should return PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED instead 
PSCI_0_2_TOS_MP_OR_NOT_PRESENT. The function is effectively not 
implemented, but in v0.2 it was mandatory, so it couldn't return 
PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED (I guess this was some kind of a workaround). 
Since v0.2 errata and v1.0 release the function is made optional and 
it should return "not supported" error - just removing the function 
should be fine (and mismatching return type issue would be gone).


Looking at the spec:

"2 Trusted OS is either not present or does not require migration. A 
system of this type does not require the caller to use the MIGRATE 
function. MIGRATE function calls return NOT_SUPPORTED."


So returning 2 in our case seems to be valid.



2. A new error code has been introduced in PSCI v1.0: 
PSCI_INVALID_ADDRESS. This error should be returned by PSCI functions 
which receive an address as the argument when the provided address is 
incorrect. In implementation in Xen this affects CPU_ON and 
CPU_SUSPEND. CPU_ON today returns invalid parameter error and that 
needs to be replaced with invalid address error. I'm not sure for 
CPU_SUSPEND since its implementation doesn't use/check any of the 
arguments today...
I disagree, not all PSCI_INVALID_PARAMETERS should be replaced by 
PSCI_INVALID_ADDRESS. They have two distinct meaning. However, I am 
not sure where we would need to use it in Xen. The error is described 
as "INVALID_ADDRESS is returned when the entry point address is known 
by the implementation to be invalid, because it is in a range that is 
known not to be available to the caller."


The only potential one would be the check on is_thumb, but even there 
it does not match the description. The range is still available to the 
guest. I think that check should just be dropped.


To be more specific, I was thinking that in xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c line 41 
for psci version other than 0.1 the PSCI_INVALID_ADDRESS error should be 
returned instead PSCI_INVALID_PARAMETERS.


This is exactly the place I was speaking in my previous e-mail. I am not 
entirely convinced we should keep the check or even switch the return to 
PSCI_INVALID_PARAMETERS as the usage does not entirely match the error 
description.


Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/15] xen/arm: vpsci: Add support for PSCI 1.1

[Julien Grall]

On 12/02/2018 23:16, Mirela Simonovic wrote:

Hi Julien,


Hi,


On 02/12/2018 10:41 PM, Julien Grall wrote:



On 12/02/2018 20:12, Mirela Simonovic wrote:

Hi Julien,


Hi Mirela,

Thank you for the review.

I've done pretty much the same work in parallel, but there are few 
additional minor changes I've made. Briefly, the difference is in 
return values that some already implemented functions should return 
starting from v1.0 (and even v0.2 errata). Please let me know whether 
you omitted that intentionally.


Could you give a bit more details here? From a brief look we don't 
seem to implement correctly:
- CPU_OFF: PSCI_DENY should be return on failure (though it should 
never fail in Xen case) and the check on the vCPU state is pointless.


I believe CPU_OFF is fine today, it never returns.

- MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE: should technically return int32_t instead of 
uint32_t. That not really matter for now.


If you speak about denying SMC64 call from AArch32, then this is 
already done in vsmccc.c (see vsmccc_call).


Agreed on above, there are 2 more:

1. MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE should return PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED instead 
PSCI_0_2_TOS_MP_OR_NOT_PRESENT. The function is effectively not 
implemented, but in v0.2 it was mandatory, so it couldn't return 
PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED (I guess this was some kind of a workaround). Since 
v0.2 errata and v1.0 release the function is made optional and it should 
return "not supported" error - just removing the function should be fine 
(and mismatching return type issue would be gone).


Looking at the spec:

"2 Trusted OS is either not present or does not require migration. A 
system of this type does not require the caller to use the MIGRATE 
function. MIGRATE function calls return NOT_SUPPORTED."


So returning 2 in our case seems to be valid.



2. A new error code has been introduced in PSCI v1.0: 
PSCI_INVALID_ADDRESS. This error should be returned by PSCI functions 
which receive an address as the argument when the provided address is 
incorrect. In implementation in Xen this affects CPU_ON and CPU_SUSPEND. 
CPU_ON today returns invalid parameter error and that needs to be 
replaced with invalid address error. I'm not sure for CPU_SUSPEND since 
its implementation doesn't use/check any of the arguments today...
I disagree, not all PSCI_INVALID_PARAMETERS should be replaced by 
PSCI_INVALID_ADDRESS. They have two distinct meaning. However, I am not 
sure where we would need to use it in Xen. The error is described as 
"INVALID_ADDRESS is returned when the entry point address is known by 
the implementation to be invalid, because it is in a range that is known 
not to be available to the caller."


The only potential one would be the check on is_thumb, but even there it 
does not match the description. The range is still available to the 
guest. I think that check should just be dropped.


Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/15] xen/arm: vpsci: Add support for PSCI 1.1

[Mirela Simonovic]

Hi Julien,


On 02/12/2018 10:41 PM, Julien Grall wrote:



On 12/02/2018 20:12, Mirela Simonovic wrote:

Hi Julien,


Hi Mirela,

Thank you for the review.

I've done pretty much the same work in parallel, but there are few 
additional minor changes I've made. Briefly, the difference is in 
return values that some already implemented functions should return 
starting from v1.0 (and even v0.2 errata). Please let me know whether 
you omitted that intentionally.


Could you give a bit more details here? From a brief look we don't 
seem to implement correctly:
- CPU_OFF: PSCI_DENY should be return on failure (though it should 
never fail in Xen case) and the check on the vCPU state is pointless.


I believe CPU_OFF is fine today, it never returns.

- MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE: should technically return int32_t instead of 
uint32_t. That not really matter for now.


If you speak about denying SMC64 call from AArch32, then this is 
already done in vsmccc.c (see vsmccc_call).


Agreed on above, there are 2 more:

1. MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE should return PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED instead 
PSCI_0_2_TOS_MP_OR_NOT_PRESENT. The function is effectively not 
implemented, but in v0.2 it was mandatory, so it couldn't return 
PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED (I guess this was some kind of a workaround). Since 
v0.2 errata and v1.0 release the function is made optional and it should 
return "not supported" error - just removing the function should be fine 
(and mismatching return type issue would be gone).


2. A new error code has been introduced in PSCI v1.0: 
PSCI_INVALID_ADDRESS. This error should be returned by PSCI functions 
which receive an address as the argument when the provided address is 
incorrect. In implementation in Xen this affects CPU_ON and CPU_SUSPEND. 
CPU_ON today returns invalid parameter error and that needs to be 
replaced with invalid address error. I'm not sure for CPU_SUSPEND since 
its implementation doesn't use/check any of the arguments today...


Thanks,
Mirela



I can submit these patches if you want. Currently I have few - one 
for each fix, easier to review. I guess all of them should be 
squashed with the patch you submitted.


One more note - starting from v1.0, PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED error should 
be returned for all optional functions that are not implemented. Is 
that the case? I.e. when there is no case for a particular function 
ID in do_vpsci_0_2_call the PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED error will be returned?


This is done by vmsccc_handle_call().
See set_user_regs(regs, 0, ARM_SMCC_ERR_UNKNOWN_FUNCTION) which is 
equivalent to PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED.


[...]


+static int32_t do_psci_1_0_features(uint32_t psci_func_id)
+{
+    /* /!\ Ordered by function ID and not name */
+    switch ( psci_func_id )
+    {
+    case PSCI_0_2_FN32_PSCI_VERSION:
+    case PSCI_0_2_FN32_CPU_SUSPEND:
+    case PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_SUSPEND:


Just a note here - PSCI_FEATURES should return additional information 
just for CPU_SUSPEND (supported power state and mode). AFAIU, that 
value is also 0, so the return code should be fine.


I think so, from what I understood this is inline with CPU_SUSPEND 
only supports 0.2 format.


Cheers,




___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/15] xen/arm: vpsci: Add support for PSCI 1.1

[Julien Grall]

On 12/02/2018 20:12, Mirela Simonovic wrote:

Hi Julien,


Hi Mirela,

Thank you for the review.

I've done pretty much the same work in parallel, but there are few 
additional minor changes I've made. Briefly, the difference is in return 
values that some already implemented functions should return starting 
from v1.0 (and even v0.2 errata). Please let me know whether you omitted 
that intentionally.


Could you give a bit more details here? From a brief look we don't seem 
to implement correctly:
	- CPU_OFF: PSCI_DENY should be return on failure (though it should 
never fail in Xen case) and the check on the vCPU state is pointless.
	- MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE: should technically return int32_t instead of 
uint32_t. That not really matter for now.


If you speak about denying SMC64 call from AArch32, then this is already 
done in vsmccc.c (see vsmccc_call).


I can submit these patches if you want. Currently I have few - one for 
each fix, easier to review. I guess all of them should be squashed with 
the patch you submitted.


One more note - starting from v1.0, PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED error should be 
returned for all optional functions that are not implemented. Is that 
the case? I.e. when there is no case for a particular function ID in 
do_vpsci_0_2_call the PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED error will be returned?


This is done by vmsccc_handle_call().
See set_user_regs(regs, 0, ARM_SMCC_ERR_UNKNOWN_FUNCTION) which is 
equivalent to PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED.


[...]


+static int32_t do_psci_1_0_features(uint32_t psci_func_id)
+{
+    /* /!\ Ordered by function ID and not name */
+    switch ( psci_func_id )
+    {
+    case PSCI_0_2_FN32_PSCI_VERSION:
+    case PSCI_0_2_FN32_CPU_SUSPEND:
+    case PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_SUSPEND:


Just a note here - PSCI_FEATURES should return additional information 
just for CPU_SUSPEND (supported power state and mode). AFAIU, that value 
is also 0, so the return code should be fine.


I think so, from what I understood this is inline with CPU_SUSPEND only 
supports 0.2 format.


Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/15] xen/arm: vpsci: Add support for PSCI 1.1

[Mirela Simonovic]

Hi Julien,

I've done pretty much the same work in parallel, but there are few 
additional minor changes I've made. Briefly, the difference is in return 
values that some already implemented functions should return starting 
from v1.0 (and even v0.2 errata). Please let me know whether you omitted 
that intentionally.
I can submit these patches if you want. Currently I have few - one for 
each fix, easier to review. I guess all of them should be squashed with 
the patch you submitted.


One more note - starting from v1.0, PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED error should be 
returned for all optional functions that are not implemented. Is that 
the case? I.e. when there is no case for a particular function ID in 
do_vpsci_0_2_call the PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED error will be returned?



On 02/08/2018 08:21 PM, Julien Grall wrote:

At the moment, Xen provides virtual PSCI interface compliant with 0.1
and 0.2. Since them, the specification has been updated and the latest
version is 1.1 (see ARM DEN 0022D).

 From an implementation point of view, only PSCI_FEATURES is mandatory.
The rest is optional and can be left unimplemented for now.

At the same time, the compatible for PSCI node have been updated to
expose "arm,psci-1.0".

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall 
Cc: Wei Liu 
Cc: Ian Jackson 
Cc: mirela.simono...@aggios.com

---
 We may want to provide a way for the toolstack to specify a PSCI
 version. This could be useful if a guest is expecting a given
 version.

 Changes in v2:
 - Return v1.1 on GET_VERSION call as claimed by this patch
 - Order by function ID the calls in FEATURES call
---
  tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c  |  3 ++-
  xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c  |  1 +
  xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c | 39 ++-
  xen/include/asm-arm/perfc_defn.h |  1 +
  xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h   |  1 +
  xen/include/asm-arm/vpsci.h  |  2 +-
  6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
index 3e46554301..86f59c0d80 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
@@ -410,7 +410,8 @@ static int make_psci_node(libxl__gc *gc, void *fdt)
  res = fdt_begin_node(fdt, "psci");
  if (res) return res;
  
-res = fdt_property_compat(gc, fdt, 2, "arm,psci-0.2","arm,psci");

+res = fdt_property_compat(gc, fdt, 3, "arm,psci-1.0",
+  "arm,psci-0.2", "arm,psci");
  if (res) return res;
  
  res = fdt_property_string(fdt, "method", "hvc");

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index 155c952349..941688a2ce 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -637,6 +637,7 @@ static int make_psci_node(void *fdt, const struct 
dt_device_node *parent)
  {
  int res;
  const char compat[] =
+"arm,psci-1.0""\0"
  "arm,psci-0.2""\0"
  "arm,psci";
  
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c

index 6ab8ab64d0..e82b62db1a 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c
@@ -106,7 +106,11 @@ static int32_t do_psci_cpu_off(uint32_t power_state)
  
  static uint32_t do_psci_0_2_version(void)

  {
-return PSCI_VERSION(0, 2);
+/*
+ * PSCI is backward compatible from 0.2. So we can bump the version
+ * without any issue.
+ */
+return PSCI_VERSION(1, 1);
  }
  
  static register_t do_psci_0_2_cpu_suspend(uint32_t power_state,

@@ -191,6 +195,29 @@ static void do_psci_0_2_system_reset(void)
  domain_shutdown(d,SHUTDOWN_reboot);
  }
  
+static int32_t do_psci_1_0_features(uint32_t psci_func_id)

+{
+/* /!\ Ordered by function ID and not name */
+switch ( psci_func_id )
+{
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_PSCI_VERSION:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_CPU_SUSPEND:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_SUSPEND:


Just a note here - PSCI_FEATURES should return additional information 
just for CPU_SUSPEND (supported power state and mode). AFAIU, that value 
is also 0, so the return code should be fine.



+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_CPU_OFF:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_CPU_ON:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_ON:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_AFFINITY_INFO:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN64_AFFINITY_INFO:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_SYSTEM_OFF:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_SYSTEM_RESET:
+case PSCI_1_0_FN32_PSCI_FEATURES:
+return 0;
+default:
+return PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+}
+}
+
  #define PSCI_SET_RESULT(reg, val) set_user_reg(reg, 0, val)
  #define PSCI_ARG(reg, n) get_user_reg(reg, n)
  
@@ -304,6 +331,16 @@ bool do_vpsci_0_2_call(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t fid)

  PSCI_SET_RESULT(regs, do_psci_0_2_affinity_info(taff, laff));
  return true;
  }
+
+case PSCI_1_0_FN32_PSCI_FEATURES:
+{
+uint32_t psci_func_id = PSCI_ARG32(regs, 1);
+
+perfc_incr(vpsci_features);
+

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/15] xen/arm: vpsci: Add support for PSCI 1.1

[Wei Liu]

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 07:21:50PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> At the moment, Xen provides virtual PSCI interface compliant with 0.1
> and 0.2. Since them, the specification has been updated and the latest
> version is 1.1 (see ARM DEN 0022D).
> 
> From an implementation point of view, only PSCI_FEATURES is mandatory.
> The rest is optional and can be left unimplemented for now.
> 
> At the same time, the compatible for PSCI node have been updated to
> expose "arm,psci-1.0".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall 


Acked-by: Wei Liu 

I will leave this patch to ARM committers.

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/15] xen/arm: vpsci: Add support for PSCI 1.1

[Julien Grall]

On 02/09/2018 04:07 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:

Hi Julien,


Hi Volodymyr,


On 08.02.18 21:21, Julien Grall wrote:

At the moment, Xen provides virtual PSCI interface compliant with 0.1
and 0.2. Since them, the specification has been updated and the latest
version is 1.1 (see ARM DEN 0022D).

 From an implementation point of view, only PSCI_FEATURES is mandatory.
The rest is optional and can be left unimplemented for now.

At the same time, the compatible for PSCI node have been updated to
expose "arm,psci-1.0".

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall 
Cc: Wei Liu 
Cc: Ian Jackson 
Cc: mirela.simono...@aggios.com

---
 We may want to provide a way for the toolstack to specify a PSCI
 version. This could be useful if a guest is expecting a given
 version.

 Changes in v2:
 - Return v1.1 on GET_VERSION call as claimed by this patch
 - Order by function ID the calls in FEATURES call
---
  tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c  |  3 ++-
  xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c  |  1 +
  xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c | 39 
++-

  xen/include/asm-arm/perfc_defn.h |  1 +
  xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h   |  1 +
  xen/include/asm-arm/vpsci.h  |  2 +-
  6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
index 3e46554301..86f59c0d80 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
@@ -410,7 +410,8 @@ static int make_psci_node(libxl__gc *gc, void *fdt)
  res = fdt_begin_node(fdt, "psci");
  if (res) return res;
-    res = fdt_property_compat(gc, fdt, 2, "arm,psci-0.2","arm,psci");
+    res = fdt_property_compat(gc, fdt, 3, "arm,psci-1.0",
+  "arm,psci-0.2", "arm,psci");

What about this place? Should it be "arm,psci-1.1"?


arm,psci-1.1 compatible string does not exist. Technically after 0.2 you 
should discover the PSCI version through GET_VERSION. So I am not 
entirely sure why arm,psci-1.0 compatible was added.


From the documentation 
(Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.txt), the compatibles means 
the PSCI implementation comply to a given version. Our implementation 
complies to 0.1, 0.2 and 1.0. So I have added 1.0 just in case a guest 
decides to check the compatible.


Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/15] xen/arm: vpsci: Add support for PSCI 1.1

[Volodymyr Babchuk]

Hi Julien,

On 08.02.18 21:21, Julien Grall wrote:

At the moment, Xen provides virtual PSCI interface compliant with 0.1
and 0.2. Since them, the specification has been updated and the latest
version is 1.1 (see ARM DEN 0022D).

 From an implementation point of view, only PSCI_FEATURES is mandatory.
The rest is optional and can be left unimplemented for now.

At the same time, the compatible for PSCI node have been updated to
expose "arm,psci-1.0".

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall 
Cc: Wei Liu 
Cc: Ian Jackson 
Cc: mirela.simono...@aggios.com

---
 We may want to provide a way for the toolstack to specify a PSCI
 version. This could be useful if a guest is expecting a given
 version.

 Changes in v2:
 - Return v1.1 on GET_VERSION call as claimed by this patch
 - Order by function ID the calls in FEATURES call
---
  tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c  |  3 ++-
  xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c  |  1 +
  xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c | 39 ++-
  xen/include/asm-arm/perfc_defn.h |  1 +
  xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h   |  1 +
  xen/include/asm-arm/vpsci.h  |  2 +-
  6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
index 3e46554301..86f59c0d80 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
@@ -410,7 +410,8 @@ static int make_psci_node(libxl__gc *gc, void *fdt)
  res = fdt_begin_node(fdt, "psci");
  if (res) return res;
  
-res = fdt_property_compat(gc, fdt, 2, "arm,psci-0.2","arm,psci");

+res = fdt_property_compat(gc, fdt, 3, "arm,psci-1.0",
+  "arm,psci-0.2", "arm,psci");

What about this place? Should it be "arm,psci-1.1"?


  if (res) return res;
  
  res = fdt_property_string(fdt, "method", "hvc");

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index 155c952349..941688a2ce 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -637,6 +637,7 @@ static int make_psci_node(void *fdt, const struct 
dt_device_node *parent)
  {
  int res;
  const char compat[] =
+"arm,psci-1.0""\0"
  "arm,psci-0.2""\0"
  "arm,psci";
  
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c

index 6ab8ab64d0..e82b62db1a 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c
@@ -106,7 +106,11 @@ static int32_t do_psci_cpu_off(uint32_t power_state)
  
  static uint32_t do_psci_0_2_version(void)

  {
-return PSCI_VERSION(0, 2);
+/*
+ * PSCI is backward compatible from 0.2. So we can bump the version
+ * without any issue.
+ */
+return PSCI_VERSION(1, 1);
  }
  
  static register_t do_psci_0_2_cpu_suspend(uint32_t power_state,

@@ -191,6 +195,29 @@ static void do_psci_0_2_system_reset(void)
  domain_shutdown(d,SHUTDOWN_reboot);
  }
  
+static int32_t do_psci_1_0_features(uint32_t psci_func_id)

+{
+/* /!\ Ordered by function ID and not name */
+switch ( psci_func_id )
+{
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_PSCI_VERSION:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_CPU_SUSPEND:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_SUSPEND:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_CPU_OFF:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_CPU_ON:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_ON:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_AFFINITY_INFO:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN64_AFFINITY_INFO:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_SYSTEM_OFF:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_SYSTEM_RESET:
+case PSCI_1_0_FN32_PSCI_FEATURES:
+return 0;
+default:
+return PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+}
+}
+
  #define PSCI_SET_RESULT(reg, val) set_user_reg(reg, 0, val)
  #define PSCI_ARG(reg, n) get_user_reg(reg, n)
  
@@ -304,6 +331,16 @@ bool do_vpsci_0_2_call(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, uint32_t fid)

  PSCI_SET_RESULT(regs, do_psci_0_2_affinity_info(taff, laff));
  return true;
  }
+
+case PSCI_1_0_FN32_PSCI_FEATURES:
+{
+uint32_t psci_func_id = PSCI_ARG32(regs, 1);
+
+perfc_incr(vpsci_features);
+PSCI_SET_RESULT(regs, do_psci_1_0_features(psci_func_id));
+return true;
+}
+
  default:
  return false;
  }
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/perfc_defn.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/perfc_defn.h
index a7acb7d21c..87866264ca 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/perfc_defn.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/perfc_defn.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ PERFCOUNTER(vpsci_system_off,  "vpsci: system_off")
  PERFCOUNTER(vpsci_system_reset,"vpsci: system_reset")
  PERFCOUNTER(vpsci_cpu_suspend, "vpsci: cpu_suspend")
  PERFCOUNTER(vpsci_cpu_affinity_info,   "vpsci: cpu_affinity_info")
+PERFCOUNTER(vpsci_features,"vpsci: features")
  
  PERFCOUNTER(vgicd_reads,"vgicd: read")

  PERFCOUNTER(vgicd_writes,   "vgicd: write")
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h
index becc9f9ded..e2629eed01 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/15] xen/arm: vpsci: Add support for PSCI 1.1

[Julien Grall]

At the moment, Xen provides virtual PSCI interface compliant with 0.1
and 0.2. Since them, the specification has been updated and the latest
version is 1.1 (see ARM DEN 0022D).

From an implementation point of view, only PSCI_FEATURES is mandatory.
The rest is optional and can be left unimplemented for now.

At the same time, the compatible for PSCI node have been updated to
expose "arm,psci-1.0".

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall 
Cc: Wei Liu 
Cc: Ian Jackson 
Cc: mirela.simono...@aggios.com

---
We may want to provide a way for the toolstack to specify a PSCI
version. This could be useful if a guest is expecting a given
version.

Changes in v2:
- Return v1.1 on GET_VERSION call as claimed by this patch
- Order by function ID the calls in FEATURES call
---
 tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c  |  3 ++-
 xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c  |  1 +
 xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c | 39 ++-
 xen/include/asm-arm/perfc_defn.h |  1 +
 xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h   |  1 +
 xen/include/asm-arm/vpsci.h  |  2 +-
 6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
index 3e46554301..86f59c0d80 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c
@@ -410,7 +410,8 @@ static int make_psci_node(libxl__gc *gc, void *fdt)
 res = fdt_begin_node(fdt, "psci");
 if (res) return res;
 
-res = fdt_property_compat(gc, fdt, 2, "arm,psci-0.2","arm,psci");
+res = fdt_property_compat(gc, fdt, 3, "arm,psci-1.0",
+  "arm,psci-0.2", "arm,psci");
 if (res) return res;
 
 res = fdt_property_string(fdt, "method", "hvc");
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index 155c952349..941688a2ce 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -637,6 +637,7 @@ static int make_psci_node(void *fdt, const struct 
dt_device_node *parent)
 {
 int res;
 const char compat[] =
+"arm,psci-1.0""\0"
 "arm,psci-0.2""\0"
 "arm,psci";
 
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c
index 6ab8ab64d0..e82b62db1a 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpsci.c
@@ -106,7 +106,11 @@ static int32_t do_psci_cpu_off(uint32_t power_state)
 
 static uint32_t do_psci_0_2_version(void)
 {
-return PSCI_VERSION(0, 2);
+/*
+ * PSCI is backward compatible from 0.2. So we can bump the version
+ * without any issue.
+ */
+return PSCI_VERSION(1, 1);
 }
 
 static register_t do_psci_0_2_cpu_suspend(uint32_t power_state,
@@ -191,6 +195,29 @@ static void do_psci_0_2_system_reset(void)
 domain_shutdown(d,SHUTDOWN_reboot);
 }
 
+static int32_t do_psci_1_0_features(uint32_t psci_func_id)
+{
+/* /!\ Ordered by function ID and not name */
+switch ( psci_func_id )
+{
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_PSCI_VERSION:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_CPU_SUSPEND:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_SUSPEND:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_CPU_OFF:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_CPU_ON:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_ON:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_AFFINITY_INFO:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN64_AFFINITY_INFO:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_SYSTEM_OFF:
+case PSCI_0_2_FN32_SYSTEM_RESET:
+case PSCI_1_0_FN32_PSCI_FEATURES:
+return 0;
+default:
+return PSCI_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+}
+}
+
 #define PSCI_SET_RESULT(reg, val) set_user_reg(reg, 0, val)
 #define PSCI_ARG(reg, n) get_user_reg(reg, n)
 
@@ -304,6 +331,16 @@ bool do_vpsci_0_2_call(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, 
uint32_t fid)
 PSCI_SET_RESULT(regs, do_psci_0_2_affinity_info(taff, laff));
 return true;
 }
+
+case PSCI_1_0_FN32_PSCI_FEATURES:
+{
+uint32_t psci_func_id = PSCI_ARG32(regs, 1);
+
+perfc_incr(vpsci_features);
+PSCI_SET_RESULT(regs, do_psci_1_0_features(psci_func_id));
+return true;
+}
+
 default:
 return false;
 }
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/perfc_defn.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/perfc_defn.h
index a7acb7d21c..87866264ca 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/perfc_defn.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/perfc_defn.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ PERFCOUNTER(vpsci_system_off,  "vpsci: system_off")
 PERFCOUNTER(vpsci_system_reset,"vpsci: system_reset")
 PERFCOUNTER(vpsci_cpu_suspend, "vpsci: cpu_suspend")
 PERFCOUNTER(vpsci_cpu_affinity_info,   "vpsci: cpu_affinity_info")
+PERFCOUNTER(vpsci_features,"vpsci: features")
 
 PERFCOUNTER(vgicd_reads,"vgicd: read")
 PERFCOUNTER(vgicd_writes,   "vgicd: write")
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h
index becc9f9ded..e2629eed01 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/psci.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ void call_psci_system_reset(void);
 #define PSCI_0_2_FN32_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE   PSCI_0_2_FN32(6)
 #define