Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xen: events: free irqs in error condition

2018-02-28 Thread Juergen Gross
On 28/02/18 09:25, Shah, Amit wrote:
> 
> On Mi, 2018-02-28 at 08:16 +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 05:32:53PM +, Shah, Amit wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Di, 2018-02-27 at 17:07 +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:

 On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:55:58PM +, Amit Shah wrote:
>
>
> In case of errors in irq setup for MSI, free up the allocated
> irqs.
>
> Fixes: 4892c9b4ada9f9 ("xen: add support for MSI message
> groups")
> Reported-by: Hooman Mirhadi 
> CC: 
> CC: Roger Pau Monné 
> CC: Boris Ostrovsky 
> CC: Eduardo Valentin 
> CC: Juergen Gross 
> CC: Thomas Gleixner 
> CC: "K. Y. Srinivasan" 
> CC: Liu Shuo 
> CC: Anoob Soman 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah 
> ---
>  drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 5 -
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> index c86d10e..a299586 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> @@ -750,11 +750,14 @@ int xen_bind_pirq_msi_to_irq(struct
> pci_dev
> *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
>  
>   ret = irq_set_msi_desc(irq, msidesc);
>   if (ret < 0)
> - goto error_irq;
> + goto error_desc;
>  out:
>   mutex_unlock(_mapping_update_lock);
>   return irq;
>  error_irq:
> + while (--nvec >= i)
> + xen_free_irq(irq + nvec);
> +error_desc:
>   while (i > 0) {
>   i--;
>   __unbind_from_irq(irq + i);
 It seems pointless to introduce another label and another loop to
 fix
 something that can be fixed with a single label and a single
 loop,
 this just makes the code more complex for no reason.
>>> I disagree, just because there are two different cleanups to be
>>> made
>>> for two different issues; it's not as if the if.. and else
>>> conditions
>>> are going to be interleaved.
>> Oh, I don't mind so much whether it ends up being two patches or a
>> single one, but IMHO the code should end up looking similar to what I
>> proposed, I would like to avoid having two loops and two labels.
>>
>> Could you rework the series so that the end result uses a single loop
>> (and label)?
> 
> That was the part I didn't like much, so it would be better if the
> patch came from you :)

I'd prefer Roger's solution, too.

Roger, in case you don't want to write the patch, I can do it.


Juergen

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xen: events: free irqs in error condition

2018-02-28 Thread Shah, Amit

On Mi, 2018-02-28 at 08:16 +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 05:32:53PM +, Shah, Amit wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Di, 2018-02-27 at 17:07 +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:55:58PM +, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > In case of errors in irq setup for MSI, free up the allocated
> > > > irqs.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 4892c9b4ada9f9 ("xen: add support for MSI message
> > > > groups")
> > > > Reported-by: Hooman Mirhadi 
> > > > CC: 
> > > > CC: Roger Pau Monné 
> > > > CC: Boris Ostrovsky 
> > > > CC: Eduardo Valentin 
> > > > CC: Juergen Gross 
> > > > CC: Thomas Gleixner 
> > > > CC: "K. Y. Srinivasan" 
> > > > CC: Liu Shuo 
> > > > CC: Anoob Soman 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah 
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 5 -
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > > > b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > > > index c86d10e..a299586 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > > > @@ -750,11 +750,14 @@ int xen_bind_pirq_msi_to_irq(struct
> > > > pci_dev
> > > > *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
> > > >  
> > > >     ret = irq_set_msi_desc(irq, msidesc);
> > > >     if (ret < 0)
> > > > -   goto error_irq;
> > > > +   goto error_desc;
> > > >  out:
> > > >     mutex_unlock(_mapping_update_lock);
> > > >     return irq;
> > > >  error_irq:
> > > > +   while (--nvec >= i)
> > > > +   xen_free_irq(irq + nvec);
> > > > +error_desc:
> > > >     while (i > 0) {
> > > >     i--;
> > > >     __unbind_from_irq(irq + i);
> > > It seems pointless to introduce another label and another loop to
> > > fix
> > > something that can be fixed with a single label and a single
> > > loop,
> > > this just makes the code more complex for no reason.
> > I disagree, just because there are two different cleanups to be
> > made
> > for two different issues; it's not as if the if.. and else
> > conditions
> > are going to be interleaved.
> Oh, I don't mind so much whether it ends up being two patches or a
> single one, but IMHO the code should end up looking similar to what I
> proposed, I would like to avoid having two loops and two labels.
> 
> Could you rework the series so that the end result uses a single loop
> (and label)?

That was the part I didn't like much, so it would be better if the
patch came from you :)

Amit

Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Berlin - Dresden - Aachen
main office: Krausenstr. 38, 10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Dr. Ralf Herbrich, Christian Schlaeger
Ust-ID: DE289237879
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 149173 B
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xen: events: free irqs in error condition

2018-02-28 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 05:32:53PM +, Shah, Amit wrote:
> 
> On Di, 2018-02-27 at 17:07 +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:55:58PM +, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > 
> > > In case of errors in irq setup for MSI, free up the allocated irqs.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 4892c9b4ada9f9 ("xen: add support for MSI message groups")
> > > Reported-by: Hooman Mirhadi 
> > > CC: 
> > > CC: Roger Pau Monné 
> > > CC: Boris Ostrovsky 
> > > CC: Eduardo Valentin 
> > > CC: Juergen Gross 
> > > CC: Thomas Gleixner 
> > > CC: "K. Y. Srinivasan" 
> > > CC: Liu Shuo 
> > > CC: Anoob Soman 
> > > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 5 -
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > > b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > > index c86d10e..a299586 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > > @@ -750,11 +750,14 @@ int xen_bind_pirq_msi_to_irq(struct pci_dev
> > > *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
> > >  
> > >   ret = irq_set_msi_desc(irq, msidesc);
> > >   if (ret < 0)
> > > - goto error_irq;
> > > + goto error_desc;
> > >  out:
> > >   mutex_unlock(_mapping_update_lock);
> > >   return irq;
> > >  error_irq:
> > > + while (--nvec >= i)
> > > + xen_free_irq(irq + nvec);
> > > +error_desc:
> > >   while (i > 0) {
> > >   i--;
> > >   __unbind_from_irq(irq + i);
> > It seems pointless to introduce another label and another loop to fix
> > something that can be fixed with a single label and a single loop,
> > this just makes the code more complex for no reason.
> 
> I disagree, just because there are two different cleanups to be made
> for two different issues; it's not as if the if.. and else conditions
> are going to be interleaved.

Oh, I don't mind so much whether it ends up being two patches or a
single one, but IMHO the code should end up looking similar to what I
proposed, I would like to avoid having two loops and two labels.

Could you rework the series so that the end result uses a single loop
(and label)?

Thanks, Roger.

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xen: events: free irqs in error condition

2018-02-27 Thread Shah, Amit

On Di, 2018-02-27 at 17:07 +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:55:58PM +, Amit Shah wrote:
> > 
> > In case of errors in irq setup for MSI, free up the allocated irqs.
> > 
> > Fixes: 4892c9b4ada9f9 ("xen: add support for MSI message groups")
> > Reported-by: Hooman Mirhadi 
> > CC: 
> > CC: Roger Pau Monné 
> > CC: Boris Ostrovsky 
> > CC: Eduardo Valentin 
> > CC: Juergen Gross 
> > CC: Thomas Gleixner 
> > CC: "K. Y. Srinivasan" 
> > CC: Liu Shuo 
> > CC: Anoob Soman 
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah 
> > ---
> >  drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 5 -
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > index c86d10e..a299586 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > @@ -750,11 +750,14 @@ int xen_bind_pirq_msi_to_irq(struct pci_dev
> > *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
> >  
> >     ret = irq_set_msi_desc(irq, msidesc);
> >     if (ret < 0)
> > -   goto error_irq;
> > +   goto error_desc;
> >  out:
> >     mutex_unlock(_mapping_update_lock);
> >     return irq;
> >  error_irq:
> > +   while (--nvec >= i)
> > +   xen_free_irq(irq + nvec);
> > +error_desc:
> >     while (i > 0) {
> >     i--;
> >     __unbind_from_irq(irq + i);
> It seems pointless to introduce another label and another loop to fix
> something that can be fixed with a single label and a single loop,
> this just makes the code more complex for no reason.

I disagree, just because there are two different cleanups to be made
for two different issues; it's not as if the if.. and else conditions
are going to be interleaved.

Anyway it's a matter of taste.

Since you've already proposed the patch, would you mind baking a proper
one and posting it?

Thanks!


> IMHO the way to solve this issue is:
> 
> while (nvec--) {
>   if (nvec >= i)
>   xen_free_irq(irq + nvec);
>   else
>   __unbind_from_irq(irq + nvec);
> }

Amit

Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Berlin - Dresden - Aachen
main office: Krausenstr. 38, 10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Dr. Ralf Herbrich, Christian Schlaeger
Ust-ID: DE289237879
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 149173 B
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xen: events: free irqs in error condition

2018-02-27 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:55:58PM +, Amit Shah wrote:
> In case of errors in irq setup for MSI, free up the allocated irqs.
> 
> Fixes: 4892c9b4ada9f9 ("xen: add support for MSI message groups")
> Reported-by: Hooman Mirhadi 
> CC: 
> CC: Roger Pau Monné 
> CC: Boris Ostrovsky 
> CC: Eduardo Valentin 
> CC: Juergen Gross 
> CC: Thomas Gleixner 
> CC: "K. Y. Srinivasan" 
> CC: Liu Shuo 
> CC: Anoob Soman 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah 
> ---
>  drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 5 -
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c 
> b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> index c86d10e..a299586 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> @@ -750,11 +750,14 @@ int xen_bind_pirq_msi_to_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, 
> struct msi_desc *msidesc,
>  
>   ret = irq_set_msi_desc(irq, msidesc);
>   if (ret < 0)
> - goto error_irq;
> + goto error_desc;
>  out:
>   mutex_unlock(_mapping_update_lock);
>   return irq;
>  error_irq:
> + while (--nvec >= i)
> + xen_free_irq(irq + nvec);
> +error_desc:
>   while (i > 0) {
>   i--;
>   __unbind_from_irq(irq + i);

It seems pointless to introduce another label and another loop to fix
something that can be fixed with a single label and a single loop,
this just makes the code more complex for no reason.

IMHO the way to solve this issue is:

while (nvec--) {
if (nvec >= i)
xen_free_irq(irq + nvec);
else
__unbind_from_irq(irq + nvec);
}

Roger.

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xen: events: free irqs in error condition

2018-02-27 Thread Amit Shah
In case of errors in irq setup for MSI, free up the allocated irqs.

Fixes: 4892c9b4ada9f9 ("xen: add support for MSI message groups")
Reported-by: Hooman Mirhadi 
CC: 
CC: Roger Pau Monné 
CC: Boris Ostrovsky 
CC: Eduardo Valentin 
CC: Juergen Gross 
CC: Thomas Gleixner 
CC: "K. Y. Srinivasan" 
CC: Liu Shuo 
CC: Anoob Soman 
Signed-off-by: Amit Shah 
---
 drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 5 -
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
index c86d10e..a299586 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
@@ -750,11 +750,14 @@ int xen_bind_pirq_msi_to_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct 
msi_desc *msidesc,
 
ret = irq_set_msi_desc(irq, msidesc);
if (ret < 0)
-   goto error_irq;
+   goto error_desc;
 out:
mutex_unlock(_mapping_update_lock);
return irq;
 error_irq:
+   while (--nvec >= i)
+   xen_free_irq(irq + nvec);
+error_desc:
while (i > 0) {
i--;
__unbind_from_irq(irq + i);
-- 
2.7.3.AMZN

Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Berlin - Dresden - Aachen
main office: Krausenstr. 38, 10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Dr. Ralf Herbrich, Christian Schlaeger
Ust-ID: DE289237879
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 149173 B
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel