On 12.09.2019 15:44, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 09.09.19 16:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 09.08.2019 16:58, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/schedule.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/schedule.c
>>> @@ -248,6 +248,20 @@ static inline void vcpu_runstate_change(
>>> v->runstate.state = new_state;
On 09.09.19 16:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.08.2019 16:58, Juergen Gross wrote:
--- a/xen/common/schedule.c
+++ b/xen/common/schedule.c
@@ -248,6 +248,20 @@ static inline void vcpu_runstate_change(
v->runstate.state = new_state;
}
+static inline void sched_unit_runstate_change(struct
On 09.08.2019 16:58, Juergen Gross wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/schedule.c
> +++ b/xen/common/schedule.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,20 @@ static inline void vcpu_runstate_change(
> v->runstate.state = new_state;
> }
>
> +static inline void sched_unit_runstate_change(struct sched_unit *unit,
> +bool
Use sched_units instead of vcpus in schedule(). This includes the
introduction of sched_unit_runstate_change() as a replacement of
vcpu_runstate_change() in schedule().
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
---
xen/common/schedule.c | 68 +--
1 file
