Hi Konrad,
On 22/06/18 14:33, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:06:16PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
On 12/06/2018 22:17, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:36:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Won't this mean the traps (if there are any) won't be recogni
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:06:16PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> On 12/06/2018 22:17, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:36:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > During the MMU setup process, Xen will set SCTLR_EL2.WNX
> > > (Write-Non-eXecutable) bit. Becaus
Hi Konrad,
On 12/06/2018 22:17, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:36:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
During the MMU setup process, Xen will set SCTLR_EL2.WNX
(Write-Non-eXecutable) bit. Because of that, the alternative code need
to re-mapped the region in a difference plac
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:36:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> During the MMU setup process, Xen will set SCTLR_EL2.WNX
> (Write-Non-eXecutable) bit. Because of that, the alternative code need
> to re-mapped the region in a difference place in order to modify the
> text section.
>
> At the moment
During the MMU setup process, Xen will set SCTLR_EL2.WNX
(Write-Non-eXecutable) bit. Because of that, the alternative code need
to re-mapped the region in a difference place in order to modify the
text section.
At the moment, the function patching the code is only aware of the
re-mapped region. Th