On 03.07.2019 20:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 17/05/2019 11:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
>> @@ -137,6 +137,13 @@ static void trace_irq_mask(uint32_t even
>> trace_var(event, 1, sizeof(d), );
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void
On 17/05/2019 11:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> @@ -137,6 +137,13 @@ static void trace_irq_mask(uint32_t even
> trace_var(event, 1, sizeof(d), );
> }
>
> +static inline void trace_irq_mask(uint32_t event, int irq, int vector,
No inline.
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 04:51:50AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The setup for calling trace_var() (which itself checks tb_init_done) is
> non-negligible, and hence a separate outer-most check is warranted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné
I think a macro or helper
The setup for calling trace_var() (which itself checks tb_init_done) is
non-negligible, and hence a separate outer-most check is warranted.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
v3: New.
--- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
@@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ static void release_old_vec(struct irq_d
