Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 03/11] x86/physdev: enable PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved for PVH Dom0
> -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: 23 February 2018 15:57 > To: Paul Durrant; Roger Pau Monne > > Cc: Andrew Cooper ; xen- > de...@lists.xenproject.org; Boris Ostrovsky ; > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/11] x86/physdev: enable > PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved for PVH Dom0 > > >>> On 23.01.18 at 16:07, wrote: > > So that MMCFG regions not present in the MCFG ACPI table can be added > > at run time by the hardware domain. > > > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné > > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich > > --- > > Cc: Jan Beulich > > Cc: Andrew Cooper > > --- > > Changes since v7: > > - Add newline in hvm_physdev_op for non-fallthrough case. > > > > Changes since v6: > > - Do not return EEXIST if the same exact region is already tracked by > >Xen. > > > > Changes since v5: > > - Check for has_vpci before calling register_vpci_mmcfg_handler > >instead of checking for is_hvm_domain. > > > > Changes since v4: > > - Change the hardware_domain check in hvm_physdev_op to a vpci check. > > - Only register the MMCFG area, but don't scan it. > > > > Changes since v3: > > - New in this version. > > --- > > xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c | 5 + > > xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c| 16 +++- > > Sadly you forgot to Cc Paul for this one. Paul - any chance you could > take a look? > Sure. LGTM. Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant > Jan > > > xen/arch/x86/physdev.c | 11 +++ > > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c > > index 5742dd1797..85eacd7d33 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c > > @@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ static long hvm_physdev_op(int cmd, > > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg) > > if ( !has_pirq(curr->domain) ) > > return -ENOSYS; > > break; > > + > > +case PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved: > > +if ( !has_vpci(curr->domain) ) > > +return -ENOSYS; > > +break; > > } > > > > if ( !curr->hcall_compat ) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c > > index 04425c064b..556810c126 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c > > @@ -507,10 +507,9 @@ static const struct hvm_mmio_ops > vpci_mmcfg_ops = { > > .write = vpci_mmcfg_write, > > }; > > > > -int __hwdom_init register_vpci_mmcfg_handler(struct domain *d, > paddr_t > > addr, > > - unsigned int start_bus, > > - unsigned int end_bus, > > - unsigned int seg) > > +int register_vpci_mmcfg_handler(struct domain *d, paddr_t addr, > > +unsigned int start_bus, unsigned int > > end_bus, > > +unsigned int seg) > > { > > struct hvm_mmcfg *mmcfg, *new = xmalloc(struct hvm_mmcfg); > > > > @@ -535,9 +534,16 @@ int __hwdom_init > register_vpci_mmcfg_handler(struct > > domain *d, paddr_t addr, > > if ( new->addr < mmcfg->addr + mmcfg->size && > > mmcfg->addr < new->addr + new->size ) > > { > > +int ret = -EEXIST; > > + > > +if ( new->addr == mmcfg->addr && > > + new->start_bus == mmcfg->start_bus && > > + new->segment == mmcfg->segment && > > + new->size == mmcfg->size ) > > +ret = 0; > > write_unlock(>arch.hvm_domain.mmcfg_lock); > > xfree(new); > > -return -EEXIST; > > +return ret; > > } > > > > if ( list_empty(>arch.hvm_domain.mmcfg_regions) ) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c > > index 380d36f6b9..984491c3dc 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c > > @@ -557,6 +557,17 @@ ret_t do_physdev_op(int cmd, > > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg) > > > > ret = pci_mmcfg_reserved(info.address, info.segment, > > info.start_bus, info.end_bus, info.flags); > > +if ( !ret && has_vpci(currd) ) > > +{ > > +/* > > + * For HVM (PVH) domains try to add the newly found MMCFG to > > the > > + * domain. > > + */ > > +ret = register_vpci_mmcfg_handler(currd, info.address, > > + info.start_bus, info.end_bus, > > + info.segment); > > +} > > + > > break; > > } > > > > -- > > 2.15.1 > ___
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 03/11] x86/physdev: enable PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved for PVH Dom0
>>> On 23.01.18 at 16:07,wrote: > So that MMCFG regions not present in the MCFG ACPI table can be added > at run time by the hardware domain. > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich > --- > Cc: Jan Beulich > Cc: Andrew Cooper > --- > Changes since v7: > - Add newline in hvm_physdev_op for non-fallthrough case. > > Changes since v6: > - Do not return EEXIST if the same exact region is already tracked by >Xen. > > Changes since v5: > - Check for has_vpci before calling register_vpci_mmcfg_handler >instead of checking for is_hvm_domain. > > Changes since v4: > - Change the hardware_domain check in hvm_physdev_op to a vpci check. > - Only register the MMCFG area, but don't scan it. > > Changes since v3: > - New in this version. > --- > xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c | 5 + > xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c| 16 +++- Sadly you forgot to Cc Paul for this one. Paul - any chance you could take a look? Jan > xen/arch/x86/physdev.c | 11 +++ > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c > index 5742dd1797..85eacd7d33 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c > @@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ static long hvm_physdev_op(int cmd, > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg) > if ( !has_pirq(curr->domain) ) > return -ENOSYS; > break; > + > +case PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved: > +if ( !has_vpci(curr->domain) ) > +return -ENOSYS; > +break; > } > > if ( !curr->hcall_compat ) > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c > index 04425c064b..556810c126 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c > @@ -507,10 +507,9 @@ static const struct hvm_mmio_ops vpci_mmcfg_ops = { > .write = vpci_mmcfg_write, > }; > > -int __hwdom_init register_vpci_mmcfg_handler(struct domain *d, paddr_t > addr, > - unsigned int start_bus, > - unsigned int end_bus, > - unsigned int seg) > +int register_vpci_mmcfg_handler(struct domain *d, paddr_t addr, > +unsigned int start_bus, unsigned int > end_bus, > +unsigned int seg) > { > struct hvm_mmcfg *mmcfg, *new = xmalloc(struct hvm_mmcfg); > > @@ -535,9 +534,16 @@ int __hwdom_init register_vpci_mmcfg_handler(struct > domain *d, paddr_t addr, > if ( new->addr < mmcfg->addr + mmcfg->size && > mmcfg->addr < new->addr + new->size ) > { > +int ret = -EEXIST; > + > +if ( new->addr == mmcfg->addr && > + new->start_bus == mmcfg->start_bus && > + new->segment == mmcfg->segment && > + new->size == mmcfg->size ) > +ret = 0; > write_unlock(>arch.hvm_domain.mmcfg_lock); > xfree(new); > -return -EEXIST; > +return ret; > } > > if ( list_empty(>arch.hvm_domain.mmcfg_regions) ) > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c > index 380d36f6b9..984491c3dc 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c > @@ -557,6 +557,17 @@ ret_t do_physdev_op(int cmd, > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg) > > ret = pci_mmcfg_reserved(info.address, info.segment, > info.start_bus, info.end_bus, info.flags); > +if ( !ret && has_vpci(currd) ) > +{ > +/* > + * For HVM (PVH) domains try to add the newly found MMCFG to > the > + * domain. > + */ > +ret = register_vpci_mmcfg_handler(currd, info.address, > + info.start_bus, info.end_bus, > + info.segment); > +} > + > break; > } > > -- > 2.15.1 ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
[Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 03/11] x86/physdev: enable PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved for PVH Dom0
So that MMCFG regions not present in the MCFG ACPI table can be added at run time by the hardware domain. Signed-off-by: Roger Pau MonnéReviewed-by: Jan Beulich --- Cc: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Cooper --- Changes since v7: - Add newline in hvm_physdev_op for non-fallthrough case. Changes since v6: - Do not return EEXIST if the same exact region is already tracked by Xen. Changes since v5: - Check for has_vpci before calling register_vpci_mmcfg_handler instead of checking for is_hvm_domain. Changes since v4: - Change the hardware_domain check in hvm_physdev_op to a vpci check. - Only register the MMCFG area, but don't scan it. Changes since v3: - New in this version. --- xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c | 5 + xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c| 16 +++- xen/arch/x86/physdev.c | 11 +++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c index 5742dd1797..85eacd7d33 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c @@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ static long hvm_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg) if ( !has_pirq(curr->domain) ) return -ENOSYS; break; + +case PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved: +if ( !has_vpci(curr->domain) ) +return -ENOSYS; +break; } if ( !curr->hcall_compat ) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c index 04425c064b..556810c126 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/io.c @@ -507,10 +507,9 @@ static const struct hvm_mmio_ops vpci_mmcfg_ops = { .write = vpci_mmcfg_write, }; -int __hwdom_init register_vpci_mmcfg_handler(struct domain *d, paddr_t addr, - unsigned int start_bus, - unsigned int end_bus, - unsigned int seg) +int register_vpci_mmcfg_handler(struct domain *d, paddr_t addr, +unsigned int start_bus, unsigned int end_bus, +unsigned int seg) { struct hvm_mmcfg *mmcfg, *new = xmalloc(struct hvm_mmcfg); @@ -535,9 +534,16 @@ int __hwdom_init register_vpci_mmcfg_handler(struct domain *d, paddr_t addr, if ( new->addr < mmcfg->addr + mmcfg->size && mmcfg->addr < new->addr + new->size ) { +int ret = -EEXIST; + +if ( new->addr == mmcfg->addr && + new->start_bus == mmcfg->start_bus && + new->segment == mmcfg->segment && + new->size == mmcfg->size ) +ret = 0; write_unlock(>arch.hvm_domain.mmcfg_lock); xfree(new); -return -EEXIST; +return ret; } if ( list_empty(>arch.hvm_domain.mmcfg_regions) ) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c index 380d36f6b9..984491c3dc 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c @@ -557,6 +557,17 @@ ret_t do_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg) ret = pci_mmcfg_reserved(info.address, info.segment, info.start_bus, info.end_bus, info.flags); +if ( !ret && has_vpci(currd) ) +{ +/* + * For HVM (PVH) domains try to add the newly found MMCFG to the + * domain. + */ +ret = register_vpci_mmcfg_handler(currd, info.address, + info.start_bus, info.end_bus, + info.segment); +} + break; } -- 2.15.1 ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel