Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 1/9] schedule: Introduce per-pcpu time accounting

2020-06-03 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 01:12 +, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: > On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 10:48 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > Actually, I tried to not only rebase this patch series to the current > mainline, but also to add x86 support. This gave me deeper > unsterstanding of the inner workings. At

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 1/9] schedule: Introduce per-pcpu time accounting

2020-06-01 Thread Volodymyr Babchuk
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 10:48 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 02:27 +, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: > > Hello All, > > > Hello Volodymyr, > Hi Dario, > > This is gentle reminder about this RFC. > > > > Sadly, Andrii Anisov has left our team. But I'm commited to continue > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 1/9] schedule: Introduce per-pcpu time accounting

2020-05-29 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 02:27 +, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: > Hello All, > Hello Volodymyr, > This is gentle reminder about this RFC. > > Sadly, Andrii Anisov has left our team. But I'm commited to continue > his work on time accounting and real time scheduling. > Ok, so, first of all, sorry t

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 1/9] schedule: Introduce per-pcpu time accounting

2020-05-25 Thread Volodymyr Babchuk
Hello All, This is gentle reminder about this RFC. Sadly, Andrii Anisov has left our team. But I'm commited to continue his work on time accounting and real time scheduling. I do realize, that proposed patches have become moldy. I can rebase them onto current master, if it would help. On Wed,

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 1/9] schedule: Introduce per-pcpu time accounting

2019-11-06 Thread Andrii Anisov
Hello Julien, On 28.10.19 16:28, Julien Grall wrote: It would be good to get a review from the scheduler maintainers (Dario, George) to make sure they are happy with the suggested states here. I would not say I'm completely happy with this set of states. I'd like to have a discussion on this

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 1/9] schedule: Introduce per-pcpu time accounting

2019-10-28 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Andrii, Sorry for the late answer. It would be good to get a review from the scheduler maintainers (Dario, George) to make sure they are happy with the suggested states here. Please see my comments below. On 11/09/2019 11:32, Andrii Anisov wrote: From: Andrii Anisov Introduce per-pcpu

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 1/9] schedule: Introduce per-pcpu time accounting

2019-09-12 Thread Andrii Anisov
Hello Volodymyr, On 11.09.19 21:01, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: Introduce per-pcpu time accounting what includes the following states: TACC_HYP - the pcpu executes hypervisor code like softirq processing (including scheduling), tasklets and context switches TACC_GUEST - the pcpu execut

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 1/9] schedule: Introduce per-pcpu time accounting

2019-09-11 Thread Volodymyr Babchuk
Andrii, Andrii Anisov writes: > From: Andrii Anisov > > Introduce per-pcpu time accounting what includes the following states: > > TACC_HYP - the pcpu executes hypervisor code like softirq processing >(including scheduling), tasklets and context switches > TACC_GUEST - the pcpu exec

[Xen-devel] [RFC 1/9] schedule: Introduce per-pcpu time accounting

2019-09-11 Thread Andrii Anisov
From: Andrii Anisov Introduce per-pcpu time accounting what includes the following states: TACC_HYP - the pcpu executes hypervisor code like softirq processing (including scheduling), tasklets and context switches TACC_GUEST - the pcpu executes guests code TACC_IDLE - the low-power st