Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 33/42] exec: Replace device_endian with MemOp

2019-08-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 19/08/19 20:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 16/08/19 12:12, Thomas Huth wrote: >> This patch is *huge*, more than 800kB. It keeps being stuck in the the >> filter of the qemu-s390x list each time you send it. Please: >> >> 1) Try to break it up in more digestible pieces, e.g. change only one >>

Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 33/42] exec: Replace device_endian with MemOp

2019-08-19 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 16/08/19 12:12, Thomas Huth wrote: > This patch is *huge*, more than 800kB. It keeps being stuck in the the > filter of the qemu-s390x list each time you send it. Please: > > 1) Try to break it up in more digestible pieces, e.g. change only one > subsystem at a time (this is also better

Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 33/42] exec: Replace device_endian with MemOp

2019-08-16 Thread Thomas Huth
On 8/16/19 9:37 AM, tony.ngu...@bt.com wrote: > Simplify endianness comparisons with consistent use of the more > expressive MemOp. > > Suggested-by: Richard Henderson > Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson > Acked-by: David Gibson This patch is *huge*, more than