Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

Jan Beulich: On 23.05.18 at 00:21, wrote: >> I have done some more testing in the meantime. The issue also affect >> 4.10.1, but not 4.10.0. That's useful since it makes the bisect shorter. >> A bisect identifies 8462c575d9 "x86/xpti: Hide almost all of .text

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

>>> On 23.05.18 at 00:21, wrote: > I have done some more testing in the meantime. The issue also affect > 4.10.1, but not 4.10.0. That's useful since it makes the bisect shorter. > A bisect identifies 8462c575d9 "x86/xpti: Hide almost all of .text and > all

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

George Dunlap: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Marek Marczykowski > wrote: >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 09:54:37AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 18.05.18 at 17:33, wrote: Yes, I'm happy to help with that. As I've said,

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 14:57 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 12:04 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > > > What if we 1) have two versions of the test -- "Fake suspend" and > > > "Real Suspend"; 2) only run "Real suspend" on hardware > > > specifically > > > marked as having a suspend

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:28 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Andrew Cooper > wrote: >> On 21/05/18 16:48, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Marek Marczykowski >>>

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 21/05/18 16:48, George Dunlap wrote: >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Marek Marczykowski >> wrote: >>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 09:54:37AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On 21/05/18 16:48, George Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Marek Marczykowski > wrote: >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 09:54:37AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 18.05.18 at 17:33, wrote: Yes, I'm happy to help

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Marek Marczykowski wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 09:54:37AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 18.05.18 at 17:33, wrote: >> > Yes, I'm happy to help with that. As I've said, the basic test is

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@citrix.com> wrote: > Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in > Qubes OS"): >> On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 12:04 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >> > What if we 1) have two

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS"): > On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 12:04 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > > What if we 1) have two versions of the test -- "Fake suspend" and > > "Real Suspend"; 2) only run "

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 12:04 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Ian Jackson > wrote: > > That's not entirely trivial then, especially for you, unless you > > want > > to set up your own osstest production instance. However, I can > > probably do

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 16:12 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki writes ("Re: Test for osstest, features > used in Qubes OS"): > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 01:26:30PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Is it likely that this will depend on non-buggy host firmware > > > ? If so > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki writes ("Re: Test for osstest, features used in > Qubes OS"): >> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 01:26:30PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: >> > Is it likely that this will depend on non-buggy host

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 09:54:37AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 18.05.18 at 17:33, wrote: > > Yes, I'm happy to help with that. As I've said, the basic test is very > > simple (rtcwake command) and already very useful. The fact that it is(?) > > broken on

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

>>> On 18.05.18 at 17:33, wrote: > Yes, I'm happy to help with that. As I've said, the basic test is very > simple (rtcwake command) and already very useful. The fact that it is(?) > broken on staging doesn't make it easier, Details on the breakage would be

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 08:00:38PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > Marek / Ian, > > Nice to see PCI-passthrough getting some attention again. > > On 17/05/18 17:12, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki writes ("Re: Test for osstest, features used in > > Qubes OS"): > >> On Thu,

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:12:09PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki writes ("Re: Test for osstest, features used in > Qubes OS"): > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 01:26:30PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Is it likely that this will depend on non-buggy host firmware ? If so > >

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

Marek / Ian, Nice to see PCI-passthrough getting some attention again. On 17/05/18 17:12, Ian Jackson wrote: > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki writes ("Re: Test for osstest, features used in > Qubes OS"): >> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 01:26:30PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> Is it likely that this will

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

Marek Marczykowski-Górecki writes ("Re: Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS"): > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 01:26:30PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Is it likely that this will depend on non-buggy host firmware ? If so > > then we need to make arrangements to test it and only do it on hosts

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 01:26:30PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki writes ("Test for osstest, features used in Qubes > OS"): > > As discussed some time ago, I'd like to help with adding tests for some > > features we use in Qubes OS. > > > > IMO the easiest thing to test

Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

Marek Marczykowski-Górecki writes ("Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS"): > As discussed some time ago, I'd like to help with adding tests for some > features we use in Qubes OS. > > IMO the easiest thing to test is host suspend. You just need to execute > "rtcwake -s 30 -m mem", and

[Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in Qubes OS

Hi, As discussed some time ago, I'd like to help with adding tests for some features we use in Qubes OS. IMO the easiest thing to test is host suspend. You just need to execute "rtcwake -s 30 -m mem", and see if the host is back to live after ~30s. Right now I know it works on Xen 4.8, but